The Jerusalem PostCaught between primal urges and aspirationsZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFDeadlineRichard Lloyd Dies: Guitarist With Influential Punk Pioneers Television Was 75ESPNRahm leads by 1, McIlroy 2 back at Abu Dhabi ChampionshipTagesschauFAQ: Was ist über die Schüsse in Krakau bekannt?BBC News'Dana, please take the job!' - Trump asks UFC boss to be White House press secretaryالشرقالرئيس الإسرائيلي يكلف جادي آيزينكوت بتشكيل الحكومةCBS NewsMore races called as Democratic majority comes into focusGuardian SportSão Paulo Formula One Grand Prix qualifying in Brazil – live again after a red flagRai NewsPistorius: "Non possiamo più mandare altri Patriot a Kiev". Tajani nel mirino del dark webCollider’Saturday Night Live’s Famous Formula Has 1 Unfixable ProblemSudinfo« S’il te plaît, accepte ce boulot » : Donald Trump propose le poste de porte-parole de la Maison Blanche à Dana White, patron de la fédération de MMA
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, November 7, 2026

Mikel Arteta responds to Arsenal penalty decision amid VAR controversy against Hull

Translate

Arsenal Football Newsletter

Mikel Arteta admitted he was surprised that Arsenal were not awarded a penalty in the win over Hull, as he called for “clarity” on the offside laws.

That came after there was controversy in the first half over a potential penalty decision.

The referee halted play to go to the monitor and review replays of Kai Havertz being dragged back in the box.

<p></p>

Perplexed: Kai Havertz

Getty

However, the rules are ambiguous on such incidents. One interpretation is that as Havertz was not “attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball,” he was not committing an offside offence.

That would mean a penalty should have been given but the law is complicated and there are examples in the past of it being interpreted in different ways.

Arsenal have been caught offside 35 times this season, by far the most in the Premier League, but Arteta jokingly referred to the penalty decision when that stat was put to him in his post-match press conference.

He said: “Are you counting the penalty? So 34!”

<p>Complaints: Kai Havertz and Martin Odegaard</p>

Complaints: Kai Havertz and Martin Odegaard

AFP/Getty

Pressed for his opinion on the Havertz incident, Arteta continued: “I don’t know, I haven’t watched it back.

“I didn’t watch it back so I don’t have to lie to you guys. I was surprised, because when they sent the referee to the monitor the bench was telling me that it’s a clear penalty, it’s pulling.

“I know they decided not to because the starting position of Kai was offside, so I don’t know what the interpretation is. I’m sure they will make that clear to understand it.”

Last season, Brentford were awarded a penalty against Leeds, though that was ruled out by VAR due to a Brentford player being offside.

However, a season earlier, Newcastle did get a penalty despite a player being in an offside position, as it was deemed that he had not committed an offside offence when he was pulled back.

“I need to understand the decision, what is overruling what in terms of the decision making,” Arteta said when asked if the laws were too complicated.

“After that I can give you an answer.”

He added: “We don’t have any clarity yet about the decision.”

View the original on Evening Standard →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.