ESPNThe tortoise and the Thunder: How patience made Shai Gilgeous-Alexander an MVPInquirerDengue fatalities in Negros Occidental rise to 23The Jerusalem PostHapoel Tel Aviv rallies in Euroleague basketball, Jerusalem stays perfect in EuroCupDaily MaverickXenophobia’s high price — why ConCourt’s defence of refugees matters for us allESPN DeportesNick Martínez abre Juego 1 de Serie Mundial y no RasmussenZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFABC NewsWATCH: Democratic Socialist aims to flip Florida Senate seatColliderThe 10 Best Movie Monsters of the Last 30 Years, RankedTechCrunchOpenAI working on new $30B raise at $1.25T valuation ahead of IPOPopular ScienceI’m buying this heated blanket for 40% off at Amazon and resisting the urge to turn on my heat before NovemberSBS 뉴스[단독] 공용차로 출퇴근한 이사장…취재에 "규정 고쳐야"الشرق"كوركوت".. رهان تركي لمواجهة أسراب المُسيرات وتعزيز صادرات السلاح
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 22, 2026

Mother banned from NDIS support job after children removed from her care

Translate

An NDIS logo is seen on a building

The woman had been working as an NDIS support care worker for five years before she was banned.  (ABC News: Patrick Stone)

In short:

A woman who had been working as an NDIS support worker for five years and had children removed from her care has been banned from engaging in work with children and people with disabilities.

She tried to overturn the decision, but it was upheld by the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT).

SACAT said they found the mother posed an "unacceptable risk" to children and a "risk of harm" to people with disability.

An NDIS support worker has failed to overturn a decision banning her from working with children and vulnerable adults after she was found to have had children removed from her care.

The Department of Human Services issued a prohibition notice in December 2025 barring the woman — who had been working as a support care worker for five years — from continuing her work.

The woman referred the matter to the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT) who last month upheld the decision made by the Department of Human Services.

"During the time she has worked in this area, Ms Golding has had no complaints concerning any risk posed to the people with disabilities she worked with," the judgement said.

"[She] told the Tribunal she should be able to work with children, as she was not an unsafe person," it said.

"The work was with people with disabilities, and she provided general support care, including driving her clients and taking them on social outings. She told the Tribunal she is a good support worker and well liked."

The judgement said that, although the woman had previously obtained clearances to work with vulnerable adults, she "poses an unacceptable risk to children, and poses a risk of harm to people with disability".

'Issue of neglect' consistent over 16 years

The judgement said that the "crux" of the Department of Human Services decision "was that over a long period of time there had been themes of significant risk associated with [the woman's] care of her children, and this was relevant to her future work both with children and with people with disabilities".

"All of [her] children ... have been removed from her care," it said.

"The matters of concern addressed in the removal of the children have been raised over a period of some years.

"The issue of neglect remained consistent through the concerns raised with investigations by the department across the years, from 2004 to 2020.

"In respect of the elder children, the concerns were the exposure of the children to ongoing domestic violence, neglect, emotional abuse, and a lack of protective capacity by [their mother].

"Later similar concerns were raised in respect of [her] three younger children, although there was not the same level of concern about domestic violence."

The SACAT judgement said that, although they found the mother "poses an unacceptable risk to children, and poses a risk of harm to people with disability", it does not mean she is "likely to, cause harm to children or people with disability".

View the original on ABC News (Australia) →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.