Bollywood HungamaSalman Khan returns to playback singing after 11 years with ‘Teri Sexy Beauty’ from MaatrubhumiCNN TürkVedat Muriqi kafasını kullandı! Fenerbahçe'den müthiş geri dönüşPunchFULL LIST: Como join Liverpool, Madrid in Champions League victory record한겨레공군 1호기 탑승자 명단 유출… 외교부 보안 용역업체 가능성InquirerSpeaker Dy defends congressional budget tweaks amid public scrutinyZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFPremium TimesNGF ​‌‌‍​‌‍⁠⁠‍‌⁠‍​‍​‌​‌​advocates coordinated data-driven solutions to bridge rice production deficitSözcüSibirya soğukları Türkiye'yi esir aldı: Cuma sabahı herkes böyle uyanacakCapital FMDPP Opposes Bail for Dusit D2 Terror Attack Convict Pending AppealSRF NewsFinanzielle Massnahmen – So will der Bundesrat die Invalidenversicherung sanierenDaily MailTrump purge BEGINS: Insiders name scapegoat who the president has already decided will take blame for midterms... as Susie Wiles' devious plot that will ignite Cabinet civil war leaks... and JD Vance sparks a West Wing squabbleCumhuriyetCeltic - Beşiktaş maçı ne zaman, saat kaçta, hangi kanalda? Şifresiz mi?
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 5, 2026

24-hour arrest clock starts from detention, not formal arrest: Supreme Court

Translate

24-hour arrest clock starts from detention, not formal arrest: Supreme Court

'No artificial distinction': SC says 24-hour arrest clock starts from detention

The Supreme Court has ruled that the 24-hour period within which an accused person must be produced before a judicial magistrate begins from the time of detention, and not merely from the time of formal arrest.The court held that arrest and detention are effectively the same for the purpose of this constitutional safeguard, as a person's liberty is curtailed in both situations.It observed that “any attempt to draw an artificial distinction between detention and arrest is constitutionally unsustainable”.

The Supreme Court also criticised several high courts for making an artificial distinction between arrest and detention.

It clarified that the requirement to produce an accused person before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours applies from the point at which the person is first detained.In another significant observation, the court ruled that the fundamental rights of an accused person must take precedence over provisions of special laws in cases involving delays in trial and the grant of bail. Referring to contradictory verdicts on bail in cases under laws such as the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the court said the constitutional rights of an accused must be given priority.The court further observed that special laws cannot serve as a guide to interpreting the Constitution. Rather, such laws must be interpreted in accordance with constitutional principles.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.