ESPNRB Barkley, WR Smith among 5 Eagles ruled out for London game vs. JagsPunchPolice return recovered stolen cars, motorcycle to owners in KanoCNN TürkMASTERCHEF'TE ELEME ADAYI KİM OLDU? 9 Ekim MasterChef'te 5. eleme adayı kim seçildi?The Jerusalem PostGov't honors creators of NAZA, The True Story for challenging claims of Yuval Abraham's documentaryUOLOs segredos da megarreforma da residência de Putin no mar NegroVanguardAmaechi’s campaign in Rivers will be difficult if…, says WikeThe RegisterMicrosoft leans on open weight model from Chinese AI lab to challenge JevGuardian SportNew Zealand v Australia: Bledisloe Cup rugby union international – liveZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFPremium TimesComoros 0-2 Nigeria: Five key observations as Eguavoen begins Olympic race with Super FalconsSözcüErmenistan Başbakanı Paşinyan'ın Azerbaycan paylaşımı olay olduسكاي نيوز عربيةبعد حذف 130 مليون ناخب من القوائم.. "حركة الصراصير" تحتج
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 10, 2026

Winner of scientific imagery contest was AI generated

Translate

The winner of an international imagery competition has been disqualified after it was found that they used generative AI. 

Nikon said the video broke the rules of the annual Small World In Motion competition that awards the best photos and videos taken through the lens of a microscope. 

The video, taken by Ning Xu, an optical engineering researcher at Tsinghua University in China at the time, "did not comply with the competition rules regarding generative AI," Nikon said in a statement. 

The decision is based on the video's eligibility and was not a judgement of the entrant's professional reputation or scientific contributions, Nikon said. 

The contest controversy 

Days after the winner was announced, microscopy experts started to question the accuracy of the clip on social media.

The winner's video showed tiny hair-like structures fluttering in the airways of a child with the rare genetic disease, primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD).

Dr Xu's video, magnified to 100 times in size, showed cilia that line airways to clear out mucus.

His video claimed to use a series of complicated light waves to illuminate different parts of the sample in colour, allowing researchers to gain a better understanding of PCD.

Green, red and purple colours

A screenshot of a Bluesky poster questioning if the video was real. (ABC: Supplied)

Edward Phelps, an associate professor at Florida University, said the images of nuclei "do not behave as nuclei" and that the cilia "appear from nowhere and do not match the known size", in the comment section of a LinkedIn post made by Nikon.

The post has since been deleted by Nikon. 

The microscopy community wrote an open letter to the competition, calling for the winners' work to be externally examined. 

"A potentially misleading portrayal of PCD is shaping public understanding of an already poorly understood rare disease," the letter stated. 

It called on clinicians and researchers who diagnose and study PCD to sign the letter and push for Nikon to enforce its own rules. 

The new winner

Following the controversy, Vietnamese researcher Nguyen Nam Nhat was awarded first place for a video of a microscopic roundworm encountering a single-celled organism called a Dileptus.

The video initially took second place. 

In September, the ABC announced the winners of the competition, which first started in 1975. 

The video was one of dozens highlighted in the competition, including baby jellyfish in ocean drops and bioluminescent sparkles.

Microscopic image of jellyfish larvae suspended in water droplet.

Jellyfish larvae suspended in water droplets, magnified 25 times. This video came third in the 2026 Nikon Small World in Motion competition. (Supplied: Benedikt Pleyer)

The winner receives a prize worth US$3,000 ($4,300). 

The competition is open to anyone around the world with an interest in film or time-lapse photography through a microscope. 

View the original on ABC News (Australia) →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.