The Jerusalem PostFlydubai aircraft reached near-supersonic speeds, extreme airframe stress levels - reportESPN DeportesFabián Ruiz deja la base de España por el nacimiento de su hijoESPNFollow live: Munetaka Murakami launches two-run homer to give White Sox leadRTP DesportoSolberg lidera na Sardenha e leva discussão do título para o último diaPunchNavy uncovers 40,000-litre illegal refinery in Rivers, arrests threeVanguardNations League: Kane, Saka score twice as England rout Croatia 7-0ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFGuardian SportSuper League Grand Final: Warrington Wolves v Wakefield Trinity – liveBBC عربيالنائب العام الإماراتي: مساعد طيّار "فلاي دبي" خطط لتنفيذ "عملية إرهابية"، ومشاركة إسرائيلية في التحقيق معهХабрДизайн на службе извлечения прибылиtazSachsen-Anhalts Landtagspräsident in spe: Der Rausch des GeldesRMF24Nieudana próba egzekucji Christy Pike. Szef więziennictwa odchodzi
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 3, 2026

Investing in brain health

Translate

Investing in human ingenuity is always a winning bet, because it is the one technology that will never become obsolete

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has spread faster than any technology in modern history. Within three years of ChatGPT’s release, generative AI has been adopted by 53 percent of the world’s population — faster than the PC and the Internet — while organizational adoption hit 88 percent last year. Global corporate investment in AI has more than doubled, with much of that money going into physical infrastructure such as data centers and power grids.

Skepticism about AI is rising almost as quickly. A survey by S&P Global found that 42 percent of companies abandoned most of their AI initiatives last year, up from 17 percent the year before, and in a recent PwC poll, 56 percent of chief executive officers reported that AI has brought their firms no measurable benefit. Communities around the world are mobilizing to prevent data centers from being built in their backyards, while documented incidents of AI harms rose by more than 55 percent last year.

However, even as governments rewrite their industrial strategies around a technology whose value they cannot yet quantify, and as investors, insisting that this time is different, drive valuations reminiscent of the dot-com boom, calls for more responsible and ethical AI are growing louder. Everyone is trying to divine the future of AI in the hope of mastering whatever comes next.

Illustration: Tania Chou

The utopian and dystopian camps suffer from the same myopia. Both assume that the future of humanity depends primarily, perhaps exclusively, on the future of AI. It does not. While optimists and pessimists alike have trained their focus on the rise of AI, they have ignored the rapid decline in brain health and brain skills.

That decline is eroding the human capacity on which every system, including AI, depends. Mental and neurological conditions, substance-use disorders, strokes and self-harm account for about one-quarter of the global disease burden. The number of people who are 65 or older living with dementia rose to 49 million in 2021 from 18.7 million in 1991 and continues to climb. Governments allocate just 2 percent of their health budgets to mental health, even after the WHO declared loneliness a “pressing health threat” in 2023.

Brain skills are in freefall too. A majority of business leaders surveyed last year by the skills training company General Assembly said entry-level employees were less prepared for their jobs than they had been five years ago, especially when it came to soft skills. Likewise, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) 2024 Survey of Adult Skills, the largest direct assessment of adult cognitive proficiency ever conducted, recorded declining or stagnant literacy across most participating countries. About 18 percent of adults in OECD countries lack basic proficiency in literacy, numeracy and problem-solving. Even among university-educated adults, proficiency fell or flatlined in most of the countries surveyed. New data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) show that student performance in reading, math, and science is declining across the OECD.

AI is fueling these trends. Emerging research suggests AI can reduce cognitive engagement, with studies finding less critical thinking and weaker neural connectivity during AI-assisted work. It can also foster over-reliance, as users sometimes accept incorrect AI outputs despite conflicting evidence or their own judgement.

Think about what this means. Just as humanity developed machines capable of taking on complex cognitive tasks, humans themselves have become less capable of performing them. The Global Brain Capital Index, which measures cognitive health and related skills, suggests that brain capital is declining at a time when trillions of dollars are being spent on AI infrastructure without a clear idea of what those investments should achieve. While a recent McKinsey Health Institute analysis estimated that the US spends about US$2.6 trillion a year on brain capital, from education to neurological care, less than 1percent of that spending goes toward disease prevention. Early intervention and research are underfunded, too.

Technological progress by itself does not make people healthier or more capable. However, the AI boom plays out, humanity would not fare well without a civilization-wide effort to rebuild brain health and cognitive skills. If AI becomes as powerful as its boosters predict, the premium on human intelligence would increase. As AI agents take over routine cognitive tasks, the value of human work would depend on qualities that machines cannot replicate, such as judgement, ethical reasoning, empathy and curiosity.

As the World Economic Forum’s employer survey last year showed, many of these human qualities are among those most in demand today and are expected to remain so through 2030. The survey also suggests that 59 percent of workers would require retraining, making investment in natural intelligence essential if human workers are to remain valuable in an AI-powered economy.

The current debate is largely focused on whether AI would save humanity or destroy it, but it could also turn out to be another technological fad. Even if the AI hype fizzles out like the metaverse craze of 2022, social and economic progress would still depend on rebuilding brain capital.

We do not need to start from scratch. Much of the necessary infrastructure already exists, thanks to those trillions of dollars already being spent on it. The challenge is to treat such investments as part of a larger system. Scaling interventions available today could give people around the world a combined 267 million additional years of healthy life by 2050 and add up to US$6.2 trillion to global GDP. Quality early-childhood programs can generate annual returns of 7 to 13 percent, while proactive investment in employee health could boost global GDP by as much as 12 percent.

That means investing in maternal and early-childhood development and shifting primary care toward preventing neurological and psychiatric disorders later in life. Workplaces can protect mental health without eroding cognitive skills, while education and professional training can be overhauled to promote lifelong learning. These are not moonshots, and there is plenty of evidence that they work.

AI itself can be part of the solution. It can enable early diagnosis of brain disorders and accelerate drug discovery. By democratizing knowledge, it can also feed curiosity and make lifelong learning easier.

The returns on brain capital do not hinge on the fate of the AI industry. Human ingenuity has economic value no matter which technology dominates the next decade. Investing in it is always a winning bet, because it is the one technology that will never become obsolete.

Harris Eyre is executive director of the Global Brain Economy Initiative. Lenny Mendonca, former chief economic and business adviser to California Governor Gavin Newsom, is senior partner emeritus at McKinsey & Company. Remington Tonar is cofounder of Cart.com.

View the original on Taipei Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.