ESPNFollow live: Ramirez's error paves way for Rays' rallyESPN DeportesOhtani estará en alineación de Dodgers en J3 vs. BrewersPunchTinubu has done more for North — YilwatdaThe Jerusalem PostIDF chief vows to apply October 7 lessons, pledges to pursue Israel's enemies at military ceremonyCNN TürkKırmızı bültenle aranan cinayet şüphelisi Mardin’de yakalandı한겨레“부가 흘러나가는 도시에서 머무는 도시로”…부를 쌓는 해법 찾다UOLPGR diz que não há evidências de que Mendonça foi alvo de arapongagem por cúpula da PFZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioEl ComercioTemblor en Chile hoy, martes 13 de octubre: hora exacta, epicentro y magnitudReality Blurred3 new reality competitions, including Assassin, and 2 revivals中国新闻网A股开盘:超3400只个股飘绿,三大指数集体低开La NaciónMurió Netinho, el artista detrás de la exitosa canción “La isla del sol”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 14, 2026

High Court opens door to prisoner’s egg freezing

Translate

A woman has won an appeal in Australia’s highest court about her right to freeze her eggs while behind bars.

Rachel Smith is serving a 10-year prison term in Queensland for trafficking in a dangerous drug.

The inmate, Rachel Smith, applied for approval to undergo egg freezing while imprisoned for the next decade.Aresna Villanueva

She will be 39 when eligible for parole and 41 once her full sentence ends.

To reduce the risk of age-related infertility, Smith applied for approval to undergo egg freezing while behind bars.

However, under state law, Corrections Queensland argued egg extraction and freezing were prohibited as they would be classified as “assisted reproductive technology”, which is banned under the Corrective Services Act 2006.

Smith challenged this, arguing against Corrections’ interpretation of the law’s wording and said her human rights were being breached.

She took Queensland Corrective Services to the Supreme Court and then the state’s Court of Appeal, but was unsuccessful.

The High Court accepted her appeal and on Wednesday found in Smith’s favour, concluding the Queensland courts had “misconstrued” the Corrective Services Act.

“Ms Smith was entitled to apply to participate in egg extraction and freezing to be undertaken by her nominated health practitioner, which is not ‘assisted reproductive technology’,” Justice Jayne Jagot said in reasons supported by three other judges.

The court set aside the lower courts’ orders and ordered Corrections Queensland to determine the application again according to law.

“In circumstances where this appeal has been granted expedition, and Ms Smith has been denied the opportunity to obtain a timely approval of her application, it is now incumbent on the chief executive to decide her application as soon as reasonably possible,” Jagot said.

Corrections was also ordered to pay Smith’s legal costs.

AAP

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.

View the original on The Sydney Morning Herald →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.