The Jerusalem PostLUMAGICA light festival returns to Tel Aviv's Hayarkon Park after 160,000 visitors in first editionESPN DeportesBarcelona anota el cuarto ante el Betis en un partido polémico y caóticoESPNNHL Tonight: Previews, storylines, betting info for all 14 gamesPunch2027: Opposition may unveil consensus candidate days to election – LukmanRTP DesportoPSG recorre às estrelas para dar a volta ao Estrasburgo, de Hugo OliveiraZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFDigital SpyTV legend Paul Whitehouse mugged at cashpoint in busy London street in "horrid" attackMintTrump trip, 14-min briefing & bar exam admission: Inside Katie Zacharia’s 5 days as Press Secretary before being firedANSASerie A: da 0-1 a 3-1, ancora una rimonta e l'Inter passa al Dall'AraSRF NewsSchweizer Cup, 2. Runde – Dorn schiesst den FCL in Winterthur in der 92. Minute ins GlückANSA SportTaekwondo: Campionati Italiani 2026, assegnati i titoli under 217sur7Pas de miracle pour les Francs Borains face à OHL, l’Antwerp évite (aussi) le piège
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 17, 2026

‘VP could still be convicted outside impeachment’

Translate

In this photo uploaded on Facebook on March 19, 2026 shows Vice President Sara Duterte at the 54th Datu Bago Awards Conferment 2026 in Davao City.

Vice President Sara Duterte via Facebook

MANILA, Philippines — The evidence uncovered on Vice President Sara Duterte’s alleged misuse of confidential funds could still lead to her criminal conviction, according to House prosecution panel spokesman Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong.

He cited as basis the Commission on Audit’s notice of disallowance of P73.287 million in confidential expenses incurred by the Office of the Vice President in December 2022.

Adiong said the COA findings could be used as basis for the filing of criminal cases against the Vice President, adding that the audit development strengthened rather than weakened the prosecution’s assessment of the confidential funds evidence.

“That will only prove that there was really prima facie evidence of misuse of public funds to benefit one’s interest or oneself,” he said.

During the impeachment trial, the prosecution presented witnesses and documents involving acknowledgment receipts, the transfer of confidential funds to security officers and compliance with government rules governing confidential expenditures.

However, the prosecution ultimately decided to drop Article I, along with two other Articles of Impeachment, which Adiong said removed a possible additional route to conviction before the Senate impeachment court.

The prosecution said it only needs one conviction to carry the constitutional consequences it seeks against Duterte and decided to concentrate on Article II, which accused the Vice President of amassing unexplained wealth.

View the original on The Philippine Star →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.