ESPN DeportesCR7 pide suspender a fans por burlas a Diogo JotaRTP DesportoEuroVolley 2026. Portugal soma quarta derrota consecutiva frente à UcrâniaESPN'I'm willing to do whatever it takes': Inside the 274 days that rebuilt Patrick MahomesThe Jerusalem PostUS President Donald Trump shares his music taste with reporters in odd exchange on Air Force OnePunchNASEMA distributes relief materials to disaster, banditry victimsInquirerSenate approves on 3rd reading 5-year term of barangay, SK officials3DNewsИлон Маск помирился с Apple — но X Corp и SpaceXAI продолжат судиться с OpenAIBusiness AMDenemarken en VS streven naar diplomatieke oplossing voor geschil over GroenlandRapplerLIVE UPDATES: First BARMM parliamentary electionsAntara NewsChinese hiker injured on Indonesia's Mount Rinjani, SAR team deployedBillboardMacklemore Dropped From Ed Sheeran Tour Over His ‘Free Palestine’ CommentsCNN بالعربية"لكن أنا الذي أستحقها".. لامين يامال يسمّى منافسه الوحيد في سباق الكرة الذهبية 2026
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 14, 2026

China rejects calls for ‘pacing’ on AI development, fearing it would entrench US tech lead

Translate

Calls by US tech leaders for a voluntary slowdown in artificial intelligence development have run into sharp pushback from Chinese researchers and state media, who question whether the proposal is a genuine push for responsibility or an effort to entrench America’s technological lead.

The debate intensified on Monday when OpenAI CEO Sam Altman joined a growing chorus of Silicon Valley leaders demanding industry-wide “pacing”, warning that competitive pressure must not override safety as AI advanced rapidly.

“The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened,” Altman wrote on social media platform X.

“Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot.”

View the original on South China Morning Post

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.