ESPN DeportesPumas visita a Puebla en duelo clave para meterse a LiguillaESPNWay-Too-Early 2027 MLB Power Rankings: Are the Brewers No. 1?The Jerusalem PostJewish leaders for social change: Nine of history's most influential Jewish activistsCNN TürkRize'de sağanak taşkına neden olduPunchHuman trafficking: Police rescue three girls in LagosInquirerJeepney driver tests positive for drugs ahead of Undas in La UnionUOLFrança reforça segurança para novos protestos no Halloween e teme ação de mascaradosالنهارتركيا ترشح فريدون سينيرلي أوغلو لمنصب الأمين العام للأمم المتحدةZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioThe Sydney Morning HeraldHyrox athlete who soiled herself ‘traumatised’ by backlashBBC NewsCelebrity Traitors comes to a climax in nail-biting finalLenta.ruВ США раскрыли последствия ударов России по Украине
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 31, 2026

Nations agree to push to get nature goals on track

Translate

Nearly 200 nations on Friday adopted hard-fought agreements at a UN biodiversity summit aimed at getting the world on course to halt the destruction of nature by 2030.

Delegates cheered as the crucial texts were approved in overtime following two weeks of tense negotiations at the COP17 conference in Armenia’s capital Yerevan.

“And that’s it. Perfect,” said COP17 president Hambardzum Matevosyan to applause as he brought down the gavel on the documents, the final versions of which were not immediately available.

The world adopted a historic pact in 2022 setting ambitious targets to halt biodiversity loss by 2030.

But ahead of the summit, the UN warned that countries would fail to meet the goal unless they urgently correct course.

Most of the objectives are falling short, including targets to protect 30% of Earth’s land and oceans, tackle pollution, and provide poorer countries with greater conservation finance.

A draft COP17 text had called on countries to “accelerate” efforts to keep the pact alive.

The much-anticipated text stressed that “increased action” was needed to tackle the root drivers of nature loss.

Highlighting the disagreements that dogged the talks, the “global review” proposed various options to achieve the 2030 goal. It was not immediately clear which made the cut.

The text “needed to respond to the irrefutable evidence that we are off track for our 2030 deadline, and while not particularly exciting or detailed, it’s good news that countries could reach agreement,” Catherine Weller from Fauna and Flora told AFP.

Kirsty Leong from WWF International told AFP the “outcome has its strengths and weaknesses, but, on balance, it’s a good outcome”.

‘Weak terms’

During negotiations, countries wrangled over reforming subsidies and other incentives that encourage activities harmful to nature, such as fossil fuels, intensive agriculture and overfishing.

Governments had pledged to reduce this spending but made little progress, with an estimated US$2.4 trillion still flowing every year to harmful subsidies.

An Lambrechts from Greenpeace International said it was crucial that spending was switched to nature protection and restoration.

“Even though the agreed decision text expresses it in weak terms, COP17 saw important political momentum to address harmful financial incentives — including subsidies — and that’s urgently needed,” she told AFP.

A separate row revolved around finding new cash sources to fund conservation efforts — a hot-button issue with public budgets under strain amid an energy crisis and conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.

To restore degraded ecosystems, save endangered species and conserve forests, wetlands and other vital natural habitats, the world needs an estimated US$700 billion more every year than it currently spends.

The EU led a charge for wealthy emerging economies such as China to contribute to global conservation efforts, a contentious issue at COP17.

In a sign of possible compromise, another draft text that circulated Friday invited countries outside the developed country donors to voluntarily join the group.

It did not compel any country to contribute to biodiversity finance but asked for volunteers to “signal interest”.

Science under attack

Efforts to refine the lacklustre Cali Fund — a UN mechanism for sharing profits from corporations that use genetic data from plants and other organisms — also proved difficult.

The fund set out to raise US$1 billion a year for conservation in developing countries when it launched in early 2025. So far, it has attracted around US$10,000.

Nations have also feuded over key scientific reports, with a small handful of countries accused of stonewalling efforts to accept the benchmark findings of a UN-backed biodiversity body.

“The attacks on science have bothered me a lot,” French Ecological Transition Minister Monique Barbut said.

Around 70 ministers joined the negotiations this week in an effort to nudge things along, while indigenous leaders and civil society activists appealed to nations to act with greater urgency.

At the last biodiversity summit in Colombia in 2024, talks ran overtime as nations haggled over conservation finance and ended without a deal. Negotiations resumed in Rome in 2025 where an agreement was reached.

Ecuador will host the next biodiversity summit in 2028.

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.