Daily MaverickThe likely Agoa extension is positive for South Africa’s agriculturePunchOsun poll: Your strides paid off, NGF hails Adeleke’s re-electionCNN TürkTürkiye ve 7 ülkeden İsrail'e tepkiESPN DeportesFalla el relevo de Jays, Yankees se despega en la séptima con producción de CaballeroThe Jerusalem PostJewish educators should stop relying on archaeology to prove Israel’s history - opinionוואלהארה"ב שוקלת סנקציות על שופט בברזילESPNPitcher, surgery pioneer Tommy John dies at 83RTP DesportoPichardo sente a idade mas já tem agenda até Los Angeles2028InquirerSenators should explain P24-billion ‘leadership fund’ – AbanteSky TG24Sardegna, barchino di migranti travolge ragazza su un sup durante sbarco: 18enne grave
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, August 16, 2026

Wildfire smoke now bigger prenatal threat than human sources of air pollution

Translate

The research doesn’t look at how much time the mother was spending outside, if she wore an N95 mask or if she had an air-filtration system in her home, which Boudreaux acknowledges as a limitation of the study. But data sources like Purple Air that track wildfire smoke are detecting a large amount of pollution in the form of a PM2.5 inside people’s homes, he said.

The new study highlighted regions and populations that were disproportionately affected by wildfire smoke. In the West and Northwest, wildfires’ contributions to air pollution more than doubled over the study period. And the communities where wildfires are responsible for the largest reversals in air quality—low-income, rural and American Indian and Alaska Native populations—often have the least access to neonatal care.

Since exposure to wildfire smoke early in life can cause life-long health problems, reducing exposure in the prenatal period will yield long-term benefits, Boudreaux said.

The last six years have seen several catastrophic fires in the West and Canada, Boudreaux said. If the team were to extend the study through 2026, he said, they’d likely see wildfires make an even higher contribution to unhealthy prenatal exposures. But that’s just speculation, he cautioned.

What is clear, he said, is that wildfire smoke now accounts for an increasing share of “acute, massive air pollution days” that endanger babies’ health. “What that tells me is that the next frontier is how do we help people manage exposure to wildfire smoke, which is a different kind of exposure than ambient pollution from other sources.”

That means providing communities with resources like clean-air shelters, air filters and better access to healthcare when they are exposed, he said. Ultimately, he said, “we should be asking, are there things we can do to reduce the risk of climate change in general?”

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

View the original on Ars Technica

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.