The likely Agoa extension is positive for South Africa’s agriculture

The US Senate supports extending the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) for another two years. But the process is not yet final. There are further processes to be completed before the bill reaches the US president for his approval. 

Positively for South Africa, it remains part of this process, and Agoa continues to benefit various sectors of the its economy. 

For South Africa’s farming sector, the US market is important, accounting for just more than $500-million in exports a year, which is about 4% of total agricultural exports of about US$15.1-billion. 

The figure may seem relatively small, and others have even argued that South African farmers must focus on China. But the US market remains critical for farmers and agribusinesses in certain value chains, particularly raisins, table grapes, citrus, nuts, and wine. 

The desire to expand access to China, and support it, especially under the zero-tariff access provisions of the China-Africa Partnership Agreement for Shared Prosperity, is understandable. But we must view the Chinese market as an addition to the group of countries that offer access to the South African markets, not a substitute for others. That is the posture that the South African farming sector and organised agriculture have maintained, and I think it’s an important approach to these trade dynamics in the current geopolitical context. South Africans do not enjoy the luxury of choosing sides. 

Other stakeholders have also questioned the benefit of Agoa in an environment where the US government has imposed tariffs on a range of goods from South Africa and other trading partners. This, again, is another important matter, but it is important that we all realise that the benefits remain quite tangible.

Tariffs and Agoa

You see, without Agoa, South African products exported to the US would typically face an additional tariff of around 3% (depending on the product) on top of the new tariffs, which are at 12.5%, bringing the total to around 15.5%.

This would have placed South African agricultural products at a disadvantage compared to competitors in the American market, such as Chile and Peru. Because of the Agoa benefit, South Africa is now on equal footing with these countries in the U.S. market, at 12.5%. 

I must also say, though, that the US has decided to modify its tariffs and exempt some food products, thus easing agricultural trade friction, which is costly to both exporting countries and US consumers. The exempted products include coffee and tea, fruit juices, cocoa and spices, as well as avocados, bananas, coconuts, guavas, limes, oranges, mangoes, plantains, pineapples, various peppers and tomatoes, beef and additional fertilisers.

From a South African perspective, oranges, macadamia nuts and fruit juices benefit from the exemption. The rest of South Africa’s agricultural products currently face a 12.5% import tariff in the US market. 

To remind us again of the agricultural economic value of this discussion, in 2025, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the US totalled US$504-million, down 3% from the previous year. This slight annual decline doesn’t suggest that the previous 30% “Liberation Day tariffs” didn’t have a negative impact on the South African agricultural sector; South Africa benefited from substantial exports in the second quarter of 2025, when there was a 90-day pause, and we have plenty of citrus products to export.

Ultimately, Agoa is not the end of the road, and I believe the South African policymakers have previously made that point clear. The idea is to have a formal trade agreement with the US after these uncertain times. But for now, a likely renewal of Agoa, with South Africa’s continued inclusion, is a positive step for agriculture to continue to compete on the same level as other key agricultural exporters to the US market. DM