Oga Obinna Responds to John Allan Namu’s Criticism of Politically Funded Podcasters

Media personality Oga Obinna has responded to investigative journalist John Allan Namu’s criticism of podcasters and content creators who receive money from politicians, insisting that he does not identify himself as a journalist.

Obinna said his company, Obinna TV Studios, is primarily a media production outfit specialising in digital content, entertainment and creative productions rather than traditional journalism.

Speaking about his work, he explained that the company’s biggest asset is its digital content and argued that interviewing guests does not automatically make someone a journalist.

“I’m not a journalist. I do have my company. It’s a media company that focuses on just productions. We do content production, meaning our biggest asset is digital assets,” he said.

He explained that his work involves scripting, comedy, music and interviewing guests to create content for digital audiences.

Obinna added that he has journalists working within his organisation to handle assignments that require journalism-related skills, distinguishing his role as a content creator and media entrepreneur from that of professional journalists.

What John Allan Namu said about podcasters

Obinna’s response follows remarks by Namu, who questioned the independence of some podcasters and digital content creators who receive money from politicians to organise events or produce content while presenting themselves as independent journalists.

The investigative journalist raised concerns about the growing financial relationships between politicians and digital media personalities, warning that such arrangements could undermine the credibility and independence of media platforms.

Namu particularly questioned the practice of accepting money from political figures under the guise of organising events while simultaneously presenting oneself as a journalist responsible for holding leaders accountable.

He also warned that undisclosed financial arrangements could create the impression that media practitioners are available to advance the interests of whoever pays them.

His concerns centred on the distinction between paid political promotion and independent journalism, particularly where content creators fail to disclose their financial relationships with politicians.

Obinna explains his company’s focus

In responding to the criticism, Obinna maintained that his platform is built around entertainment and content production rather than investigative reporting.

He argued that journalism involves responsibilities such as research, investigations, fact-checking and holding public officials accountable, which are not the primary focus of his company’s operations.

Instead, he said his objective is to inspire, motivate and entertain audiences through productions created by his team.

Obinna also pointed to the journalists employed by his company, saying they handle journalism-related assignments while he concentrates on content creation and the business side of media production.