ESPN DeportesNFL: Jahmyr Gibbs se convirtió en la figura de la Semana 3InquirerPiston prefers tax-free oil products to P1 fare hikeESPNNo. 8 Liberty keep foot on gas to eliminate top-seeded LynxDaily MaverickMexico’s National Guard debuts tiny Chihuahua recruitThe Jerusalem PostCanadian Jews considering immigration to US under Trump amid increasing fear of antisemitismUOLVínculos com Lula, Flávio Bolsonaro e Cláudio Castro marcam debate entre candidatos no RJХабрGreenplum как расширение PostgreSQL 19SCMP ChinaSlow is beautiful: China launches war against AI drama, goes beyond algorithmsBusiness AMBusiness AM Sudoku’s 30-09-2026La Tercera“El Estado se habría quedado con un solo proveedor”: FNE explica por qué no pidió excluir de contratos públicos a empresas acusadas de colusión por vales de alimentaciónColliderThe 10 Best Stephen King Audiobooks, RankedLenta.ruВ России указали на препятствия Евросоюза на пути к мирным переговорам
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Supreme Court lets Trump’s third-country deportations resume

Translate
The U.S. Supreme Court's order to resume deportations for now signals the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump may have the upper hand.

The U.S. Supreme Court's order to resume deportations for now signals the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump may have the upper hand. | BLOOMBERG

Sep 30, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court, for now, let the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump resume deporting people who entered the country without legal permission to countries other than their own with little if any notice. The court will hear arguments on the issue in December.

Granting an administration request Tuesday over the dissents of the three liberal justices, the high court put on hold a federal judge’s order that required people who are being deported to get notice and a meaningful chance to argue that they would be at risk of persecution or torture. The new decision will apply while the justices consider the government’s appeal.

The court’s conservative majority didn’t offer an explanation, but the order signals the administration may have the upper hand. The justices laid out several questions for both sides to address in their briefs, including whether the lower court had jurisdiction over the case and authority to enter a sweeping block, and whether the government’s policy violates U.S. immigration law or constitutional due process protections.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information,
quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

View the original on The Japan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.