Witness explains ‘unexplained, hidden’ wealth in Sara Duterte trial

MANILA, Philippines — Investigations into the alleged unexplained wealth of a public officer can cover properties and assets belonging not only to their spouse but also to their minor children, retired Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang told the Senate impeachment court on Monday.
Cabotaje-Tang was called to the witness stand by the prosecution team in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte in relation to her alleged unexplained wealth.
Article 2 of the impeachment complaint also accused Duterte of failing to “fully and truthfully disclose all her and her spouse’s assets, liabilities, and net worth” in her statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth (SALN), and failing to divest all her business interests during her tenure as vice president from 2022 to 2025.
Article continues after this advertisement
But when does an official’s wealth become questionable under the law?
FEATURED STORIES
NEWSINFO
NEWSINFO
NEWSINFO
Public prosecutor Jose Manuel Diokno posed this question during his direct examination of the witness.
READ: Diokno: Tang needed to explain how unexplained wealth is violation
“Ayun sa batas ito’y kwestyunable (Under the law, it is considered questionable) if during the incumbency of the public official, he acquired wealth that is grossly disproportionate to his salary, other lawful income, and income generated from his legitimately acquired properties,” Cabotaje-Tang said.
“Paano malamalaman ng pamahalaan kung ang isang opisyal ay mayroon ngang unexplained wealth?” Diokno then asked.
Article continues after this advertisement
(How can the government determine whether an official has unexplained wealth?)
According to the witness, unexplained wealth can be determined usually by checking whether an official has filed a true and accurate SALN.
Article continues after this advertisement
But investigators could also look into the official’s lifestyle and income tax return, Cabotaje-Tang added.
When Diokno asked what other documents investigators should look at when examining whether an official had unexplained wealth,” the witness answered: “Even the properties and assets of the spouse and the children under 18 years of age…”
At this point, Counsel for the defense team, Mark Vinluan, objected.
“Actually this is the danger that we’re concerned about because I don’t think the prosecution qualified this witness as an expert witness. Therefore , whatever opinion that she will share with us today is not expert opinion, but just her personal opinion,” Vinulan said.
“And that’s the danger of presenting her because she might present her own interpretations of the law again, which is the function of this court, your honor. So w’ere objecting to this line of questioning,” he added.
But Presiding Officer and Sen. Francis “Chiz” Escudero reiterated his ruling when he allowed the witness to testify in the trial that her testimony would still be subject to cross examination or the defense’s presentation of another witness.
READ: Impeach court allows ex-Sandiganbayan justice Tang to testify on SALN
“Beside, anything she says as the presiding officer said earlier is neither conclusive nor binding upon this court. So we will note the objection, but the objection is overruled,” Escudero stressed, noting the defense lawyer’s continuing objection to the witness’ qualifications to testify in the trial.
Earlier in her testimony, Cabotaje-Tang was asked about the difference between hidden wealth, unexplained wealth, and ill-gotten wealth.
In simple terms, the witness defined hidden wealth as wealth that is being concealed.
“For example , a public officer actually owns a property but that property is registeredin the name of another person,” she said.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.
Ill-gotten wealth, on the other hand, refers to wealth that is acquired through illegal means such as bribery, misappropriation, and malversation. /jpv
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.