InquirerBarbers: Prenup or not, evidence vs Sara Duterte enough to convict herESPN Deportes¿Dónde se ubica Charlyn Corral en la historia del futbol mexicano?ESPNWhy Mbappé and Yamal didn't deserve to win Ballon d'OrThe Jerusalem PostFlavio Bolsonaro's whereabouts unknown, Brazil cancels passports after missed deadlineBollywood HungamaVardhaan Puri to star in Param Veer, a film based on the 1971 Battle of GangasagarDaily MaverickDELICATELY BALANCED: Starc masterclass and Proteas mistakes give Australia an edge at NewlandsZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFBillboardNFL Commissioner Roger Goodell Says He Requested Jay-Z Take Super Bowl Stage ‘Whenever the Moment Felt Right’Il Fatto Quotidiano“Stavolta sarà diverso, prevedo l’affluenza più alta di sempre tra gli arabi”: intervista al candidato escluso dalle elezioni israeliane Abu ShehadehMexico News DailyGovernment invests US $60M to restore polluted, drought-impacted Lake Pátzcuaroالشرقإقبال قياسي بانتخابات إسرائيل.. والليكود يطلب تمديد التصويت وسط اعتراضاتPremium TimesFamily announces burial arrangements for Nigerian actor Steve Echendu
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Unnamed celebrity accused of 'inappropriate sexual activities', court hears

Translate

A trial has begun in which a celebrity is asking the High Court to prevent two news organisations from publishing his identity and allegations that he abused his status for many years to engage, or attempt to engage, in "inappropriate sexual activities with a large number of girls and young women".

The unnamed celebrity's legal team said any publication would "highly likely lead him to commit suicide".

They told the court that his drastic reaction was not because of any wrongdoing, but because of the fear of "trial by media".

The man denies abusing "his power and position as a celebrity to contact and forge relationships with young women and teenagers to try to have sex with them", the court heard.

The legal team for ITN and The Guardian told the court that the celebrity's "suicide risk" could be mitigated and there was no proper basis "to restrain the publication of public interest journalism".

A medical report carried out for the court said inpatient treatment could provide "significant, but not complete mitigation of the risk", but that treatment, perhaps for months, had "a realistic potential to reduce the risk".

The judge, Mr Justice Nicklin, said there was "significant public interest" in the proceedings and that "this is a difficult and important case". He added: "The court must determine it fairly, on the evidence and legal submissions."

View the original on BBC News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.