El ComercioIrán busca evitar una nueva guerra con EE.UU.: ¿qué concesiones nucleares estaría dispuesto a hacer?PunchASUU awards N1.1m scholarships to 11 UI studentsDaily MaverickYemen’s Houthis deny launching drone after coalition reports interception in Mecca regionInquirer5,000 security troops fielded for Undas in Zamboanga PeninsulaInquirer EntertainmentKris Aquino on relationship with Marcoses: ‘They’ve been very respectful’CNN TürkFon yatırımcısına ara ödeme başlıyor: Öncelik hangi fonların, üst sınır ne?The Jerusalem PostFrance reimposes restrictions on Israeli defense firms at Euronaval 2026ESPNTransfer rumors, news: Man United eye move for Leeds' Calvert-Lewin in JanuaryBollywood HungamaMohit Malik on playing Birju Lohar in Mirzapur The Movie: “We cannot approach a character by simply deciding whether he is good or bad”Straits Times SportCosmic Speed will be hard to catch in Race 7ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDF20 MinutenGanz ruhig klaut diese Barbesucherin eine Tischlampe
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 30, 2026

Accused sex predator Richard Neil disputes DNA link to Ontario crime scenes

Translate

A Toronto man accused of grisly attacks on children in public parks in southern Ontario in the 1990s repeatedly this week disputed evidence against him and insisted police arrested the wrong man.

'It's not me,' Neil tells court as trial for string of 1990s assaults continues

Thomas Daigle · CBC News

·

Text to Speech Icon

Listen to this article

Estimated 4 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

A man wearing sunglasses and a white shirt opens a door.
Richard Neil leaves a Brampton, Ont., courthouse on Oct. 16. The 67-year-old is on trial for a series of sex assaults against children in the 1990s. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

WARNING: This story contains details of sexual assaults against children

A Toronto man accused of grisly attacks on children in public parks in southern Ontario in the 1990s repeatedly this week disputed evidence against him and insisted police arrested the wrong man.

"It's not my DNA," Richard Neil testified at his trial in Brampton. "It's not me."

Crown prosecutors say DNA evidence links Neil to crime scenes in Kitchener, Brampton and Oakville, three decades after the "woodland attacker" case baffled investigators. 

Two boys, aged eight and 10, and a 15-year-old girl each told police they'd been lured into wooded areas, tied up and raped by a stranger. The victims all said they'd been forced to drink the assailant's urine during the attacks, which occurred between 1992 and 1995.

The jury heard Neil wasn't arrested until March 2024, after forensic genetic genealogy pointed to him as a suspect. Prosecutors said further laboratory analysis found it's "20 quadrillion times more likely" that the DNA at the crime scenes belonged to Neil, rather than another, random person.

WATCH | Underwear worn as mask:

DNA on underwear worn as mask helped identify alleged child rapist

October 18|

Duration

1:58

Warning: Story contains details of sexual assaults against children | 31 years after a teen girl was forced into the woods and attacked in an Oakville, Ont., park, a jury has been shown underwear worn as the assailant’s mask. A forensic scientist testified that DNA on the underwear matched the accused, Richard Neil, who is on trial for a series of sexual assaults against children in the 1990s.

"I'm not a scientist," he said from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice witness box on Tuesday, according to an audio recording reviewed by CBC News.

"All I can say is it was not me. I had nothing to do with it."

Neil, 67, has pleaded not guilty to the 17 charges including kidnapping, sexual assault causing bodily harm and administering a stupefying drug.

Assistant Crown attorney Monica MacKenzie said it was an "impossible coincidence" that multiple pieces of evidence — including fingerprints — also connect Neil to the three attacks.

The jury was previously told Neil's fingerprints were lifted from two shopping bags and a two-litre pop bottle located at Wildwood Park in Oakville, where the girl was assaulted in August 1995. 

An 'interest in urine'

During her cross-examination, MacKenzie also zeroed in on the accused's "interest in urine."

Neil acknowledged that he developed a urine-drinking "fetish" around 2012, insisting "it's actually quite common." 

"Anytime I've engaged in that act," he said, "it's been with consenting male adults only." 

The court heard the British-born Neil immigrated to Canada with his family as a child. He grew up in Kitchener, where the first boy was assaulted in the city's Idlewood Park, in August 1992. At the time, the jury was told Neil had a home in neighbouring Waterloo.

He spent much of his career working as a Toronto-area driver for employers such as Canada Post, UPS and Bell.

MacKenzie, the prosecutor, said Neil happened to be unemployed when the first two attacks — in Kitchener in 1992 and in Brampton's Norton Place Park in September 1994 — occurred. She said at the time of the 1995 Oakville attack, Neil's job involved delivering phone books and that he had a "very loose schedule."

A green plastic bottle cut lengthwise, next to a ruler

The jury was shown this image of a two-litre pop bottle recovered from the scene of a brutal attack in Oakville, Ont., in 1995. The 15-year-old victim told police the unknown assailant forced her to drink urine from the bottle. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

When he was arrested in 2024, Neil was splitting his time between his Toronto condo and a house in Victoria. The court previously heard officers searched both addresses after he was detained.

Neil testified that he was awoken from a nap when police showed up at his door in Toronto to arrest him and seize his electronic devices.

Previously detained, not fingerprinted 

Once DNA evidence had linked all three assaults in the 1990s, forensic scientists looked at roughly 310 persons of interest over the years, a witness previously testified.

It appears likely they would not have had Neil's DNA or fingerprints in their database, or his name on their list of suspects, at the time. 

Other than traffic violations, the court heard Neil had only one previous run-in with police. 

He testified that he was 19 years old when he and another man had been detained for "two, three hours, tops" for a drinking offence in Toronto. They weren't charged and officers didn't take their fingerprints, Neil said.

The jury also previously heard contemporaneous police interviews of the three victims, who were not required to testify at trial. The Crown and defence both agreed the attacks took place as the children described at the time.

"There's no quarrel as to what occurred, or that these crimes took place," Neil's defence lawyer, Leo Adler told the jury.

"The issue has been from the start, who is the individual responsible."

Neil, a divorced father of three, is set to resume his testimony on Friday. 

A sign reading "Norton Place Park"

In September 1994, a 10-year-old boy told police he was walking through Brampton's Norton Place Park, when he was approached by a stranger and lured to a nearby wooded area where he was sexually assaulted. (Patrick Morrell/CBC)

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is a CBC News reporter based in Toronto. In recent years, he has covered some of the biggest stories in the world, from the 2015 Paris attacks to the Tokyo Olympics and the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. He's reported from the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, the Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa and the Pope's visit to Canada aimed at reconciliation with Indigenous people. Thomas can be reached at thomas.daigle@cbc.ca.

View the original on CBC News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.