The Jerusalem PostBereaved families' forum seeks Shin Bet probe into alleged Ra'am voter-tracking appInquirer EntertainmentSanya Lopez fronts FHM Philippines’ comeback under new managementZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFVarietyChang Chen Urges Emerging Taiwanese Actors to ‘Be Like Water’ at Taiwan Creative Content Fest Golden Horse ShowcaseRapplerThis activist lives the real-world struggle of ‘Bloom Where You Are Planted’GIGAZINE無料で近くにスマートグラスがあるかどうかを教えてくれるアプリ「Nearby Glasses」SBS 뉴스국민의힘 "대통령 인사전횡 막장의 끝…이용철 지명 철회하라"The Sydney Morning Herald‘Clicky Ponting’ handed two-year suspension for finger-clicking deceptionWirtualna PolskaTrump: Rosja i Ukraina chcą się dogadać中国新闻网巴拉圭总统遭弹劾 副总统宣誓接任ESPN CricinfoIndia bowl first in rainy Wellington with both teams unchangedNew Straits TimesPalmer must focus on Chelsea after England snub, says Alonso
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, November 7, 2026

No let-up in Adani’s Mumbai airport move, Air France, Emirates turn to Centre

Translate

The dispute comes amid plans for the phased transition of international flights from Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (CSMIA) to Navi Mumbai International Airport (NMIA). (Express Photo by Sankhadeep Banerjee)

Foreign airlines have approached the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), seeking clarification on whether the Centre has approved the Adani Group-operated Mumbai airport’s proposal to temporarily withdraw flights to 14 international destinations from Terminal 2 (T2).

In a communication to MoCA Secretary Sameer Sinha, the Airline Operators Committee (AOC)-Mumbai said Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) had denied historical slots to 11 Gulf-based carriers, citing a proposed reduction of five million passengers per annum (mppa) in the airport’s capacity from the Northern Summer Schedule 2027, which begins in late March. The affected airlines include Gulf Air, Riyadh Air, Air Arabia, Kuwait Airways, Oman Air, Flyadeal, Saudia, Qatar Airways, Jazeera Airways, SalamAir and Flynas.

The AOC has sought the Centre’s intervention, requesting it to advise MIAL to reconsider its decision and honour the historical slots of all affected airlines in accordance with the applicable 2013 MoCA Slot Guidelines and the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Worldwide Airport Slot Guidelines (WASG).

While expressing support for the redevelopment of Terminal 1B, the committee said any decision to reduce airport capacity should be preceded by “constructive stakeholder consultation, transparency, and regulatory compliance”, without adversely affecting airlines’ established operational interests and historical slot entitlements.

Notably, the AOC had also previously sought the Centre’s intervention against the “unilateral decision” for capacity reduction at T2 to accommodate displaced passenger traffic from T1B by MIAL authorities.

The dispute comes amid plans for the phased transition of international flights from Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (CSMIA) to Navi Mumbai International Airport (NMIA). The 14 destinations had previously been identified by Indian carriers as part of their proposed transition plans. These included flights to and from Dammam, Riyadh, Muscat, Madinah, Jakarta, Jeddah, Dhaka, Doha, Bahrain, Kathmandu, Kuwait, Ras Al Khaimah, Sharjah, and Fujairah.

In an email to MoCA dated October 30, MIAL had also presented its position on the proposed capacity reduction, arguing that transitioning flights to the aforementioned 14 destinations out of CSMIA would ensure that all flights are available at one airport instead of being split between two, minimising passenger inconvenience and seamless onward connections.

View the original on The Indian Express →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.