ESPN DeportesCristiano, cerca del adiós: ¿cómo se retiraron otras leyendas?RTP DesportoEm ambiente conturbado. Portugal defronta Dinamarca após saída de Cristiano RonaldoESPNWhy Darnell Washington has become the Steelers' X factorThe Jerusalem PostIDF: 170 Hamas, PIJ terrorists killed in Gaza were misrepresented as 'innocent journalists'ColliderThe Fate of 'Reacher's First Spin-Off Has Officially Been DecidedThe Hollywood Reporter‘Reacher’ Spinoff ‘Neagley’ Renewed for Season 2 at Prime VideoDeadline‘Reacher’ Spinoff ‘Neagley’ Renewed For Season 2 At Amazon7sur7Les États-Unis durcissent à nouveau leur régime de sanctions contre l’IranSRF NewsKrieg in der Ukraine – Russische Drohnen treffen Schule und Südbrücke in KiewBBC NewsMan City not 'above the rules', says No 10 after backlash to Burnham remarksPremium TimesUnsettled by students’ poor performance, Akwa Ibom disputes report published by PREMIUM TIMESMintTaylor Swift’s former Beverly Hills home, where she wrote ‘1989’, is up for sale at nearly $8 million: See what’s inside
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

MI5 warns UK academics their research may have helped Chinese spies

Translate

Institutions told to trace who is really financing their work or risk falling foul of national security law

MI5 has warned that more than 100 UK-linked academics contributed to research projects allegedly funded to improve China's spying capabilities.

The Security Service issued an unusually public espionage alert this week naming the China General Technology Research Institute (CGTRI), also translated as the China Academy of General Technology (CAGT). MI5 says the organization has "very strong ties" to China's Ministry of State Security (MSS), the country's civilian intelligence agency.

According to MI5, CGTRI's "primary purpose" is to fund academic research that directly improves the MSS's technical espionage capabilities.

REG AD

More than 100 UK-linked academics have contributed to CGTRI-funded projects involving AI, cybersecurity, covert communications, and steganography, the agency said. Some may not have known who was ultimately financing the work.

REG AD

"This activity supports MSS espionage, which poses a threat to UK national security," MI5 said.

MI5 isn't accusing all of the academics involved of knowingly helping Chinese intelligence. Its alert acknowledges that many institutions and individuals likely dealt with CGTRI "in good faith" because of what it describes as the organization's "obfuscated links" to the MSS.

MI5 "strongly advised" UK universities to review immediately any current or planned collaboration with CGTRI and ensure that the MSS derives no further benefit from British research. Academics working with Chinese institutions are also being told to establish who is ultimately funding the research and make sure CGTRI isn't involved.

Researchers may also want to brush up on the National Security Act 2023. MI5 specifically highlighted two offenses: assisting a foreign intelligence service under section 3 and obtaining a material benefit from one under section 17.

Under section 3, a person can commit an offense if their conduct is likely to materially assist a foreign intelligence service with UK-related activities and they know, or "ought reasonably to know," that it is likely to do so. Section 17 separately covers accepting or retaining a material benefit when the recipient knows, or ought reasonably to know, that it came from a foreign intelligence service. Legitimate payment for lawful goods or services is excluded.

Having publicly identified CGTRI's alleged links to Chinese intelligence, MI5 warned that any institution or researcher continuing to conduct work funded by the organization should seek independent legal advice.

In other words, MI5 has put universities on notice: not knowing who was really behind the research money may have been understandable yesterday, but it is a considerably trickier argument today. ®

View the original on The Register →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.