ESPN DeportesMéxico intenta reaccionar con ímpetu ante ColombiaThe Jerusalem PostUN's Albanese claims Jews in Nazi camps were called ‘Muslims,’ distorts history of 'antisemitism'한겨레[Column] Harari’s 2030s: A new age of repressive desublimationSouth China Morning PostIndonesia eyes China for massive 2,772km railway project – with cautionSözcüTrump savaşı uzatıyor dünya çilesini çekiyorRappler‘3-in-1 teachers’: 2-day wellness break not enough to unplugSDP EspectáculosCynthia Klitbo revela si su amistad con Ernesto Laguardia continuará tras La Casa de los Famosos MéxicoCNN TürkKars'ta trafik kazasında 4 kişi yaralandıVanguardMad rush into deadly pits for gold: 374 illegal mining sites in 17 states uncoveredMalay MailG25 urges Negeri Sembilan MB Ismail Lasim to resign after flip‑flops on ruler’s removalObservador Desporto"É impossível abrir o portão." Águas Santas lida com prag...Rai NewsAraghchi: "Nostre condizioni per riapertura Hormuz chiare. Aspettiamo risposta definitiva Trump"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 27, 2026

‘Is EOCO responsible for determining lawyers’ fees?’ – Baffour Awuah

Translate

Member of Parliament for Manyhia South, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, has questioned whether the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) is responsible for regulating or determining lawyers’ professional fees.

In a Facebook post on Saturday, September 26, the MP said the latest allegation against him followed an earlier claim that he had refused to honour an invitation from EOCO.

“First, they said I refused to honour their invitation. When that propaganda failed, they now claim that I charged unapproved professional fees,” Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah wrote.

He then questioned the basis of the latest claim, asking: “But the question is: Is EOCO responsible for regulating or determining lawyers’ professional fees?”

His comments come after he denied allegations that GHS2.2 million out of a GHS5 million amount was paid to him or his law firm, SBA and Partners, as legal fees.

The MP also denied claims that he or SBA and Partners transferred money to the then Managing Director of SIC Life Savings and Loans.

He further rejected allegations of a judicial sale of a property for GHS24 million, maintaining that no such judicial sale took place and, consequently, there could have been no remittance of GHS6 million from an alleged buyer to himself or his firm.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:  

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

View the original on MyJoyOnline →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.