וואלהמשרד הבריאות מזהיר: כדורי ההרזיה G-Slim מכילים חומר תרופתי אסורRTP DesportoJoão Almeida nos convocados para os Mundiais de ciclismo de estradaPunch2027: Reps deputy spokesman backs Tinubu with new mobilisation groupThe Jerusalem PostDenis Mukin sentenced to 22 years for murder of Diar Omari in road disputeInquirer EntertainmentLOOK: Empress Schuck expecting baby girlInquirerFilipino historian named honorary professor in MexicoDaily MaverickCoalition likely in Philippines’ Muslim south with no clear winner in electionColliderPrincess Donut Officially Gets Her Own ‘Dungeon Crawler Carl’ ReleaseSouth China Morning PostWho will shoulder the debts behind Indonesia’s China-backed Whoosh railway?Sky TG24Legge elettorale, Calenda: "Perpetua scontro nel Paese"Deadline‘We Will Dance Again’ Exec Joins Israel’s Yoav Gross Productions To Run ContentStraits Times SportBit of luck to go a long way for All About Al
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Regulation of educational institutes: SC issues notice to school education secretary on contempt plea

Translate

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought a response from the school education secretary in the Ministry of Education on a petition alleging non-compliance of its order to consider a plea seeking directions to regulate all institutions imparting education or religious instruction to children aged below 14.

A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu issued notice to T K Anil Kumar, Secretary , Ministry of Education, and sought his reply in four weeks.

The top court was hearing a contempt plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who alleged that the secretary did not take any action on his representation.

On May 11, the top court had directed Upadhyay to make a representation before the Union of India with his plea.

The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Dubey, had sought directions to "take appropriate steps to register, recognise, supervise and monitor all institutions imparting secular education or religious instructions to children up to the age of 14 years in the spirit of Article 21A read with Article 39, 45 and 51-A".

The petition stated that Article 30 does not grant any special or additional rights to minorities beyond what is already guaranteed under Article 19 .

"Direct and declare that Article 30 is a specific reiteration of Article 19 and doesn't confer any additional rights, benefits or privileges than the rights guaranteed to the citizens under Article 19," the plea said.

"Petitioner is filing the Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 for registration, recognition, supervision, and monitoring of all institutions imparting secular or religious education to children up to 14 years in the spirit of Article 21A, 39, 45 and 51-A.

"Petitioner submits that children are the backbone of the nation's growth and are also gullible and naive due to their tender age. Hence, the State has heightened responsibility towards them. This is an issue of national security as young kids form the future of the nation, can be brainwashed or manipulated in the unregistered institution," it said.

Upadhyay, in his plea, has claimed that he visited several districts along the Uttar Pradesh border, where numerous unregistered and unrecognised institutions were allegedly found operating.

He said unregistered and unrecognised institutions are proliferating across the border areas of the country without any effective oversight or regulatory mechanism.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

View the original on Hindustan Times

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.