The Jerusalem PostPalestinian election candidate warns West Bank could ‘explode’ unless Israel releases tax fundsESPN Deportes¿Quién es el hacker que destapó el dopaje financiero del Man. City?InquirerUnhealthy air quality for sensitive groups in parts of Metro Manila – DENRRTP DesportoEm ambiente conturbado. Portugal defronta Dinamarca após saída de Cristiano RonaldoESPNJoey Porter Jr. traded: What move means for Cowboys, SteelersDaily MaverickLOCAL ELECTIONS 2026: Navigating ballots, candidates, and wards: Your guide to the 2026 local government electionsVarietyParamount, CNN Chief Mark Thompson in ‘Early Stages’ of Discussions to Keep Him in PostIl Sole 24 OreStadi e concerti, con le ondate di calore i raduni accrescono rischi e decessiRai NewsChioggia, viene rimproverato dal padre e lo ferisce con un utensile da cucina: 17enne in casermaSportstarSouth Africa World Cup 2027 Schedule: Full Fixtures, Dates, Venues and OpponentsBBC NewsBurnham's Man City comments 'completely out of touch', Tories sayCBS NewsBolivia's attorney general arrested for alleged money laundering, drug trafficking
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

US continues to be 'a very significant partner', UN peacekeeping chief says

Translate

In an interview with FRANCE 24, UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix said the US continues to be "a very significant partner", despite owing $3 billion to peacekeeping. With the UN forced to cut about 25 percent of its capacity, Lacroix defended missions that cost just 0.2 percent of global military spending: "Peacekeeping is a good deal really."

Speaking to FRANCE 24 at UN headquarters in New York, Lacroix insisted the US "is and will be and has been a critical partner to peacekeeping", despite Washington owing $3 billion in past dues and Congress yet to decide on future funding. He stopped short of any prediction, saying simply: "I'm hopeful that this will continue to be the case." Lacroix acknowledged, however, that "the financial constraints, especially last year, have led us to cut about 25 percent of our capacity".

To those who find peacekeeping too expensive, Lacroix pointed out that its total cost this year will be "0.2 percent of military expenditures in the world". He said he is asking only for resources "that would be commensurate to the mandates that are given to us by the Security Council", warning that missions leaving too early are "very bad news for the population", as seen in Mali, Haiti and Darfur.

With UNIFIL, the UN's peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, due to shut down at the end of the year, the UN has submitted to the Security Council an option for a continued presence in Lebanon, at the request of the Lebanese authorities – a move opposed by Israel.

"The main point is that Lebanon needs international support," Lacroix said.

View the original on France 24 →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.