The Jerusalem PostUN nuclear watchdog IAEA raises alarm over uninspected Iranian uranium enrichment plant at IsfahanDaily MaverickCape Verde president eyes new term as party builds on legislative winInquirerOriental Mindoro inflation surges to 9.3% in OctoberPunchPolice arrest two over murder of motorcyclist in RiversCNN TürkMalatya’da helikopter neden düştü? Uzman isim değerlendirdi: Kazanın ardındaki 3 ihtimalХабрКэширование в Redis: типичные ошибки, которые превращают ускорение в деградациюZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio7sur7Ce Diable qui a impressionné Mark van Bommel en Turquie: “Il sera vendu pour un très gros montant”Observador DesportoZero propõe investimento em casas junto a transportesStraits Times SportGo with Joyful Joy in Race 11EuronewsIRGC says it destroyed US radar in Bahrain after attack on southern IranNHK 社会マイクロソフトの障害 メールの相談や課題提出できない大学も
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, November 13, 2026

Ruling on 2025 election’s ‘unconstitutional state’ raises questions on electoral reform

Translate
Judges of the Supreme Court in Tokyo on Wednesday

Judges of the Supreme Court in Tokyo on Wednesday | POOL /VIA JIJI

Nov 13, 2026

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that the July 2025 Upper House election took place in an “unconstitutional state.” Although it said the election would not be invalidated, the decision once again puts a spotlight on the debate over electoral reform. But any changes require parliamentary agreement, and despite the ruling, that’s unlikely to happen anytime soon.

Here’s a look at some of the basic questions the ruling has raised.

What happened with the ruling?

In a time of both misinformation and too much information,
quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

View the original on The Japan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.