CNN Türkİstanbul’da FETÖ operasyonu: 19 şüpheli gözaltına alındıBollywood HungamaBigg Boss 20: Qazi Touqeer recalls being labelled “arrogant” after turning down Ekta Kapoor’s TV offer in 2005: “Main chhota tha, 20 saal ka…”PunchWorld Anaesthesia Day: Doctors call for better equipment, fundingDaily MaverickWORLD FOOD DAY EDITORIAL: Hungry by design: hunger must be on the ballot on 4 NovemberRTP DesportoLiga Europa. Benfica goleia Celtic por 4-1The Jerusalem Post'We'll knock it out fast': Trump threatens Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site with strikesInquirer3 dead, 1 wounded in Negros Oriental town shootingESPNTransfer rumors, news: Arsenal eye January move for Bayern Munich defenderInquirer EntertainmentAl Pacino to get lifetime achievement award from the Screen Actors GuildZDF heuteSo haben sich die Mieten in Ihrer Region entwickeltUOLEm sabatina, Lula dá guinada sobre redução da maioridade penalSky TG24Elezioni Usa Midterm, Anthropic integra chatbot Claude contro le fake news
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 16, 2026

Nagoya court dismisses lawsuit filed on paper under digital civil litigation rules

Translate

The Nagoya District Court has dismissed a lawsuit that was filed on paper by a lawyer, ruling that the filing was procedurally improper under Japan’s digitalized civil litigation system, sources have said.

Presiding Judge Ryo Kaiami issued the ruling on Oct. 1 without holding oral arguments, they said.

Amended legislation requiring the digitalization of civil court proceedings took effect in May. While individuals representing themselves are still permitted to submit documents on paper, lawyers acting as legal representatives are required to file documents online.

In its ruling, the court determined that the lawsuit was “procedurally improper because it failed to comply with the prescribed filing method.”

The lawyer had cited a computer malfunction as the reason for filing on paper. However, the judge ruled that the problem amounted to a failure to properly prepare and maintain the necessary equipment, adding that the lawyer could have used another device. The court therefore found that the circumstances did not justify an exception to the online filing requirement.

In August, the lawyer filed the lawsuit on behalf of a man from Aichi Prefecture, seeking to overturn an administrative disposition by a municipal government in the prefecture.

According to the lawyer, the district court had contacted him and instructed him to resubmit the complaint online. However, he said he did not withdraw the lawsuit because the deadline for challenging the administrative disposition was approaching.

View the original on The Japan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.