The Jerusalem PostRubio dismisses Amnesty criticism over Iran war, calls organization ‘a fraud’ESPNFollow live: Bucky Irving's 72-yard run sets up Bucs TD coming out of halftimeESPN DeportesCheco Pérez: GP Singapur, última gran oportunidad para CadillacInquirerSolon hits Maynilad for poor service while they continue to earnInquirer EntertainmentWhy Sydney Sweeney’s Marilyn Monroe connection is a win for Hollywood glamour한겨레닷새째 연락 끊긴 60대 등산객…구조견 ‘단디’가 2시간30분만에 발견ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFCollider‘Bourne’ Meets ‘Jack Ryan’ in Jon Bernthal’s Gritty Spy Thriller Back on StreamingUOLJoão Bosco, com novo disco e show em São Paulo, ilumina aspecto coletivo de sua obraThe Japan TimesChina announces candidate for WHO chiefBBC News BrasilPor que Douglas Ruas deve se tornar governador do Rio dias depois do 1º turnoCBS NewsEl-Sayed and Rogers toss insults in Michigan Senate debate
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 9, 2026

Plea in Supreme Court against appointment of CEC Gyanesh Kumar and two Commissioners

Translate

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar with Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu (left) and Vivek Joshi. (File Photo)

A plea filed in the Supreme Court has challenged the appointment of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, on the ground that it violated the procedure laid down by a 2023 law governing such appointments.

The petition by Suri Payala stated that as per Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, the Search Committee was required to draw up a panel of five names for each EC vacancy, but only six names were proposed for the two vacancies when they arose in March 2024.

The petition points out that the SC in its March 22, 2024, order while refusing to stay the 2023 Act had, however, said that section 6 “postulates five prospective candidates which appears to mean that for two vacant posts ten prospective candidates should have been shortlisted”. The plea said that the Secretary, Legislative Department, had forwarded to the Leader of Opposition a list of over 200 persons even before the Search Committee had finalised a shortlist. The next day, the panel recommended six names and picked Kumar and Sandhu.

He wondered if this subscribed to the requirements of section 6 of the Act.

View the original on The Indian Express →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.