ESPN DeportesRays arma rally tras error e iguala serie a GuardiansInquirerHouse bill renews Cebu Pacific franchise for 50 yearsThe Jerusalem PostFemale IDF officer denied entry to Haredi military base because of gender, IDF saysESPNUSWNT's never-say-die DNA on full display in rally for draw with SpainDaily MaverickIsle of Wight fossil sheds light on enigmatic meat-eating dinosaursPunchEguavoen wants Falcons focus on LA 2028 gold한겨레선관위특검, 중선관위 등 5곳 압수수색…선거용품 업체와 유착 혐의ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSportstarRanji Trophy LIVE score today: Karnataka, Tamil Nadu in with a chance; Delhi, Kerala on the backfootThe Hollywood ReporterBen Affleck Calls Filming ‘Justice League’ a “Low Point” in His Career: “About as Gross as It Gets”Daily MailFour out of five new jobs went to foreigners in the past decade, new report revealsسكاي نيوز عربيةمسؤولان: طهران تغير أسلوب استهداف السفن تزامنا مع الانتخابات
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Rachel Smith will turn 39 in prison. The high court says she could freeze her eggs from behind bars

Translate

A woman has won an appeal in Australia’s highest court about her right to freeze her eggs while behind bars.

Rachel Smith is serving a 10-year prison term in Queensland for trafficking in a dangerous drug.

She will be aged 39 when eligible for parole and 41 once her full sentence ends.

To reduce the risk of age-related infertility, Smith applied for approval to undergo egg freezing while behind bars.

However, under state law, Corrections Queensland argued egg extraction and freezing were prohibited as they would be classified as “assisted reproductive technology”, which is banned under the Corrective Services Act 2006.

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email

Smith challenged this, arguing against Corrections’ interpretation of the law’s wording and said her human rights were being breached.

She took Queensland Corrective Services to the supreme court and then the state’s court of appeal, but was unsuccessful.

The high court accepted her appeal and on Wednesday found in Smith’s favour, concluding the Queensland courts had “misconstrued” the Corrective Services Act.

“Ms Smith was entitled to apply to participate in egg extraction and freezing to be undertaken by her nominated health practitioner, which is not ‘assisted reproductive technology’,” Justice Jayne Jagot said in reasons supported by three other judges.

skip past newsletter promotion

The court set aside the lower courts’ orders and ordered Corrections Queensland to determine the application again according to law.

“In circumstances where this appeal has been granted expedition, and Ms Smith has been denied the opportunity to obtain a timely approval of her application, it is now incumbent on the chief executive to decide her application as soon as reasonably possible,” Justice Jagot said.

View the original on The Guardian Australia →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.