ESPN DeportesCardinals timbra la primera gracias a sencillo productor de Joshua BáezESPNLouisiana court rules for the players: Who's affected and what happens nowוואלהנער פונה במצב קשה לאחר שנפל מגובה של כ-4 מטרים בבני ברקInquirerMalacañang orders alternative learning modes amid rains, haze한겨레시총 적어 코스닥 상장폐지 위기 ‘흑자 기업’, 코넥스로 옮긴다RapplerOpenAI commits $1 billion to cyberdefense effort amid AI safety scrutinyThe Sydney Morning HeraldCritics hail Danny Boyle's Murdoch biopic Ink as "riveting", "his best film in decades"The Indian ExpressInside Bollywood’s paid trolling industry: How crores are spent to destroy star reputationsCNN بالعربيةنائب ترامب: دول الخليج تساعد سراً في عزل إيرانSoompiWatch: Kim Ji Yeon, Park Seo Ham, And More Showcase Powerful Chemistry At Script Reading For New Drama “Dive Into You”경향신문청와대 “호르무즈 파병, 절차 따라 검토 단계…전투·비전투 종합 검토”National PostSouth Korea prepares for possible naval deployment to Strait of Hormuz: reports
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 4, 2026

Govt says no coercive action in Gymkhana Club eviction proceedings until Sep 16

Translate

No coercive action would be taken until September 16 regarding the eviction notice issued to the iconic Delhi Gymkhana Club (DGC), the government told the high court on Thursday. “We will not take any action in a coercive manner till 16th,” additional solicitor-general Chetan Sharma and standing counsel Ashish Dixit submitted before a bench of Justice Avneesh Jhingan.

The assurance came as the court is hearing an application for a stay on the June 29 notice issued to the club under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, or the PP Act. Vijay Khurana, a club member, and the DGC Staff Welfare Association filed the plea

In the notice, an estate officer had directed the club’s representative to appear on or before July 7 to explain why the eviction proceedings should not continue in accordance with the earlier eviction order. It cited the termination of the club’s lease on May 22 and the government’s exercise of its right of re-entry under the lease deed.

The notice said that the club’s continued occupation constitutes unauthorised occupation under the PP Act. It added that the club’s land is required for defence infrastructure, public security, governance infrastructure and other projects serving the public interest.

Khurana’s counsel, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, sought time to obtain instructions after the court asked whether the petitioners were willing to file their response to the notice, as the question on whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the petitions remained pending. “Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to have instructions. The interim arrangement in the meantime will continue till the next date,” the court said. It fixed September 16 as the next date of hearing.

In their application, Khurana and the association said the June 29 notice is based on “entirely erroneous and premature assumptions”. They argued it was issued even as their suit challenging the notice directing the club to vacate the premises remains pending before the Delhi high court and the validity of the lease termination is yet to be decided.

In an affidavit, the government said the pleas were unmaintainable as the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain them. It said that the PP Act bars civil courts from granting any injunction in respect of action an estate officer takes or proposes to take.

The affidavit said the officer alone has the jurisdiction to adjudicate the applications arising out of the eviction proceedings.

The DGC, adjacent to the Prime Minister’s residence in the heart of Lutyens’ Delhi, was established in 1913 as the Imperial Delhi Gymkhana Club. It was renamed after Independence and remains one of the country’s oldest and most prestigious clubs.

On May 22, the government directed the club to hand over its premises to the Land and Development Office by June 5, invoking a public-purpose clause in the original lease deed. The order noted that the property is located in a “highly sensitive and strategic area”.

On May 26, the government told the court that it would not take immediate possession of the property. It added that any eviction-related action would be undertaken only in accordance with law and after issuance of prior notice.

View the original on Hindustan Times

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.