InquirerP500-M needed to finish new 9-storey PUP building – solonThe Jerusalem PostIsraeli man caught speeding on Highway 90 at 217 kph under the influence of drugsRTP DesportoJorge Jesus confirma titularidade do capitão. Ronaldo admite: "Os portugueses estão a contar comigo".ESPN DeportesAdmiten dos errores en Atlético vs Real MadridESPNInternational break preview: USMNT's next generation, Messi's farewell, AFCON qualifyingBollywood HungamaUdta Teer trailer out: Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan bring comedy, action and chaos to the big screenCollider‘John Wick’ Meets ‘Killing Eve’ in New Action Series Officially Premiering in 2 Weeks [Exclusive]VarietyTom Cruise Is the Last Great Movie Star Still Chasing His Oscar. Can He Overcome ‘Digger’ Reviews to Get Him There?ABC NewsPossible measles exposure at Busch Stadium, local St. Louis-area businessesVilaWebBaltasar Picornell, a un pas de judici per haver difòs una foto en la qual es titllava de “nazi” Jorge CamposDeadline‘Maserati: The Brothers’ Actress Maya Talem Signs With MAD CelebritySRF NewsEurovision Song Contest 2027 – Nach Boykott: Niederlande nehmen nun doch am ESC teil
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Barbers: Prosecution relying on evidence, not new voting threshold

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — The House prosecution is relying on its evidence to convict Vice President Sara Duterte in her impeachment trial — not a modified voting threshold, former Rep. Robert Ace Barbers, House prosecution adviser and spokesperson, said on Wednesday.

Barbers stressed that point during a post-trial news briefing after being asked about Senator-Judge Imee Marcos’ argument during the proceedings that the “finish line” should not be moved simply because the race had become difficult to finish.

“Right from the start of this trial, we have never relied on numbers,” Barbers said in Filipino.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Barbers: Prosecution relying on evidence, not lower voting threshold

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

“That can be 16, 15, 14, 13. Whatever the number is, we are confident in our evidence — that our witnesses will present evidence to support the allegations in the four articles that we have submitted to the impeachment court,” he added.

According to Barbers, the prosecution hopes senator-judges will ultimately decide the case based on the evidence presented during the trial.

“Let the evidence speak,” he stressed.

Earlier, the Senate impeachment court overturned the fixed 16-vote threshold for convicting Duterte, ruling that the constitutional requirement of two-thirds of all Senate members should be applied based on the number of senator-judges participating in the proceedings.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Diokno: Prosec’s job not easier despite conviction vote ruling

The court voted 13-1, with six senator-judges not participating, to reverse Presiding Officer Sen. Francis “Chiz” Escudero’s July 6 ruling that 16 votes, or two-thirds of the full 24-member Senate, would be needed to convict Duterte.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So again, we’re confident that we can surely, at the end of this trial, we are very confident that we can get a conviction based on the evidence and testimonies of our witnesses,” Barbers said. /atm

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.