InquirerHabagat still prevails over parts of Luzon on Tuesdayוואלהתחזית מזג האוויר: עלייה בטמפרטורות והכבדה בעומסי החוםThe Jerusalem PostIsrael must remember the danger carried by Gaza kites, Hamas dictating tempo at border - editorialESPN DeportesSeigler decide triunfo de Red Sox sobre Marlins en novena entradaESPNPolice close case into death of Bills DT Oliver's son한겨레전북 역사 연구 50년…전북사학회, 창립 50주년 학술대회Daily MaverickTHE INTERVIEW: Irene Bourquin: The doula putting education at the centre of pregnancy careUOLMinistério Público denuncia Adilsinho e mais três por morte de advogadoCNewsБолее 80% пермяков ждут от ИТ-компаний практических советов по цифровой безопасностиBBC BusinessThe Gurkha families fighting for their pensionsABC News (Australia)Breaking: Small aircraft crash reported in remote Northern Territory watersBBC NewsAsbestos killed my mum in her 40s – was her school to blame?
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, August 25, 2026

COMP: Critical minerals EO boost to Pax Silica

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines’ new critical minerals framework could help advance the long-term ambitions of the planned Pax Silica hub in New Clark City, particularly as the project eventually moves into mineral processing and other higher-value industries.

For the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines (COMP), the framework established under Executive Order (EO) No. 122 does not directly align with the Pax Silica hub’s immediate priorities, yet it could support the project as it moves further up the value chain.

“We believe that Pax Silica is primarily focused on establishing a semiconductor manufacturing hub in Clark. The broader goal is to eventually bring in processing plants, smelters and chip manufacturers, but we’re still some way from that,” COMP vice president Rocky Dimaculangan said in a message to the Inquirer.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Pax Silica faces costly power, water and land trade-offs

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

‘Opportunity’ for Mindanao

“For now, it’s semiconductors first, then gradually moving up the value chain. EO 122 should help get us there,” Dimaculangan added.

The Philippines, offering a 1,619-hectare site in New Clark City, agreed to take part in a US-led push in what participating countries described as a “historic opportunity and demand for energy, critical minerals, manufacturing, technological hardware, infrastructure, and new markets not yet invented.”

READ: Marcos on Pax Silica: PH minerals won’t be exploited by foreign investors

As Dimaculangan noted, Trade Undersecretary Ceferino Rodolfo had also said critical mineral processing would not be the hub’s immediate focus, but could be pursued over the medium to long term.

Article continues after this advertisement

In an earlier forum, the Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA), the agency leading the project, said critical minerals that could support industries within the hub may come from the Visayas and Mindanao, potentially generating spillover investments in those regions.

The Mindanao Development Authority has thrown its support behind EO 122, which it sees as an opportunity to attract more mineral-related investments to the region.

Article continues after this advertisement

“For Mindanao, this is the opportunity to transform mineral wealth into lasting prosperity for our communities, and to become a strategic Philippine gateway to the global critical-minerals and clean-energy economy,” agency chair Leo Magno said in a statement.

Should Pax Silica eventually expand into mineral processing, Dimaculangan said EO 122 could support those plans as the order “sets a framework to expedite extraction and processing of critical minerals in the Philippines by making ease of doing business better and making investments in processing more competitive.”

Transparency sought

Even with the anticipated gains from the EO, there is also growing pushback against that directive.

The Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM) criticized the lack of a “clear industrial policy” paired with President Marcos’ “overly optimistic view of critical minerals,” which it said would only sacrifice the country’s land.

“We reject EO 122 for shamefully promoting ‘sustainable mining’ when it has been clearly debunked as a concept,” the group said.

“The emphasis on privatization and expansion of mineral lands is a direct threat to food and water security and poses health risks to affected communities,” it added. “We completely reject the provision declaring ‘relinquished, expired and cancelled’ mining contracts to be converted into mineral lands.”

Under EO 122, Marcos directed the government to pursue the exploration, development, processing and utilization of critical minerals while encouraging investments in higher-value products used in advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, batteries and electronics.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), through the Mines and Geosciences Bureau, will also implement a “national exploration and mineral reservation program” to identify and evaluate “new critical mineral deposits.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

ATM challenged Marcos and the DENR “to immediately start discussions with affected communities on how to address ongoing barricades and legal questions against destructive mining projects.” /cb

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.