Daily MaverickHOUSEHOLD SQUEEZE: Fuel levy cut offers brief relief as food basket outpaces SA’s unchanged SRD grantPunchOgun police command strengthens GBV response with trainingEl ComercioEstados Unidos revela su hoja de ruta para Venezuela: reformas, vacancia de Delcy Rodríguez y eleccionesInquirer EntertainmentLyca Gairanod resumes studies after song ‘Puede Nang Mangarap’ resurgenceInquirerArmy kills 2 NPA rebels, seizes arms in separate Eastern Visayas opsBollywood HungamaPVR INOX sees record Q2 as Indian box office crosses Rs 4,000 crore for FIRST time in a quarter!The Jerusalem PostBen-Gvir calls for arrest of Arab party heads amid Qatar-linked election interference claimsCollider‘Ready Player One’ Meets ‘Dexter’ in Gerard Butler’s Brutal Sci-Fi Thriller Officially Streaming for FreeZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFIl Fatto QuotidianoRocco Siffredi con la moglie Rózsa Tassi, Benji e Fede, Elisabetta Gregoraci con la sorella Marzia: ecco il cast di “Pechino Express 2027” e le nuove rotteBusiness AMGoudprijs daalt in aanloop naar Amerikaanse inflatiecijfersNMESlipknot’s Eloy Casagrande on new album: “We are making real music, we are not thinking about business”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 29, 2026

South Korean prosecutor seeks death penalty for Yoon over martial law

Translate

A South Korean special prosecutor on Thursday demanded the death penalty for ousted president Yoon Suk-yeol, ahead of an appeal court verdict on rebellion charges over his brief imposition of martial law in December 2024.

The Seoul High Court has yet to set a date for a verdict on Yoon’s appeal of a life sentence handed down in February by the Seoul Central District Court. The court found that he illegally mobilised troops and police to seize the legislature, arrest political opponents and establish unchecked rule for a “considerable time”.

Investigators led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk also appealed the ruling, arguing Yoon deserved the death penalty because his actions posed a grave threat to the country’s democracy. An execution would be unlikely. South Korea has not executed anyone since 1997, effectively maintaining a moratorium on capital punishment following calls for its abolition.

During the hearing at the high court, Cho’s team said only the death penalty could fully hold Yoon accountable for a crime as serious as orchestrating a rebellion and that the country’s long-standing pause on executions should not prevent courts from imposing death sentences.

Yoon’s legal team told reporters that prosecutors were repeating an argument “devoid of evidence and legal logic” and claimed that Yoon’s martial law was intended to raise public awareness about what he called attempts by the opposition-led legislature to paralyse state affairs. It said Yoon had no intention of causing harm or establishing authoritarian rule.

People take part in a protest calling for the ousting of then South Korean president Yoon Suk-yeol outside the National Assembly in Seoul on December 7, 2024. Photo: AFP

People take part in a protest calling for the ousting of then South Korean president Yoon Suk-yeol outside the National Assembly in Seoul on December 7, 2024. Photo: AFP

Yoon’s martial law decree, announced late at night on December 3, 2024, lasted only hours until a quorum of lawmakers broke through a blockade of heavily armed soldiers and police at the National Assembly and voted to overturn it, forcing his cabinet to lift the measure.

Yoon was suspended from office on December 14, 2024, after being impeached by the liberal-led legislature and was formally removed by the Constitutional Court in April 2025. He was rearrested in July 2025 and has faced multiple criminal trials over the martial law debacle and other allegations, with the rebellion charge carrying the heaviest punishment.

In addition to appealing his life sentence for rebellion, Yoon has also appealed a 30-year prison term in a case accusing him of ordering drone flights in 2024 to deliberately heighten tensions with North Korea and create a pretext for martial law at home. Yoon’s lawyers said the drone flights were a response to North Korea flying thousands of trash-carrying balloons into the South.

View the original on South China Morning Post →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.