InquirerMarcos swears in Zalameda as chief justicePunchEx-Kwara ADC spokesperson defects to APCThe Jerusalem PostGunman behind deadly Krakow mass shooting dies in hospital as investigation into motives continues한겨레지역 유일 상급종합병원 울산대병원 노조 “구조조정 중단하라”N + 1Океан стал синее и зеленее вблизи Большого мусорного пятнаZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFObservador DesportoTrump admite provável encontro com Xi e Putin na ChinaRFI 中文日本国家安保战略将不提中国“威胁”只提“挑战”سكاي نيوز عربيةأبوظبي تشهد رقما قياسيا عالميا لسيارة BYD الكهربائية الخارقةEuronewsTrump calls Nvidia chief Jensen Huang an 'honorable guy' amid spy allegationsDaily MailThey fought for their country. Their reward? Euthanasia. Veterans with serious injuries or PTSD reveal they are being invited to end their lives under Canada's assisted dying systemBBC News BrasilAtirador mata 6 em praça no centro de Cracóvia, na Polônia, e morre após confronto com a polícia
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, November 9, 2026

Defense witness confirms that “Barangay 74-A” and “Matina Crossing” are the same

Translate

Davao City Assessor Jaime Adalin answers questions at the Senate impeachment court on Nov. 9, 2026.

Senate PRIB

MANILA, Philippines — The first defense witness in Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial testified Monday, November 9 that two barangay names linked to her disputed property declarations refer to the same area in Davao City.

Davao City Assessor Jaime Adalin said Barangay 74-A and Matina Crossing are the same area, potentially explaining a discrepancy in the location of properties listed in Duterte's Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN).

But when questioned about a property purchased by Duterte's husband, Manases Carpio, for P6 million in 2024, Adalin said he could not say with certainty whether it was the same property listed in her SALN.

Duterte faces an impeachment allegation that she failed to fully disclose her assets and liabilities, including properties in Matina. While other charges against her have been dropped before the Senate impeachment court, she remains accused of unexplained wealth and discrepancies in her SALN.

During the defense's examination of Adalin, lawyer Lindon Baquel sought to establish that Barangay 74-A and Matina Crossing referred to the same location.

Benjamin Tolosa, counsel for the prosecution, said the prosecution panel was willing to stipulate that the document presented showed the two names referred to the same area.

The defense, however, preferred to have Adalin confirm this himself.

Questions over P6-M property 

Tolosa later confronted Adalin with an Electronic Certificate Authorizing Registration, or eCAR, dated July 2024, which showed that Carpio purchased a property for an actual selling price of P6 million.

Asked whether he could say with 100% certainty that the property covered by the transfer certificate of title, or TCT was the same property declared in Duterte's SALN, Adalin said he was uncertain.

Adalin explained that the subpoena issued to his office had asked him to verify a specific TCT.

Senate impeachment court presiding officer Chiz Escudero also questioned Adalin about the property records.

"If this honorable impeachment court would require us to submit or subpoena to submit all properties on by Attorney Manases (Carpio) in that particular barangay, then we will submit your honor," Adalin said.

Alleged failure to disclose. Article II of the Articles of Impeachment includes allegations that Duterte failed to fully disclose her assets and liabilities, including properties in Barangay Matina.

In October, a witness from the Land Registration Authority identified a 379-square-meter lot in Matina that Carpio purchased for P6 million in 2024.

The witness testified that the property did not match any entry in Duterte's 2025 SALN based on its price, location or mode of acquisition.

View the original on The Philippine Star →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.