Little Britain star David Walliams accused of using fame to groom teenagers

British children's author and comedian David Walliams used his fame to groom girls and young women for sex, two British news outlets have reported.

Mr Walliams is best known for comedy sketches on 'Little Britain', a hugely popular British TV show in the 2000s.

He has also published more than 40 children's books with some including 'Gangsta Granny', adapted into television comedy dramas and stage productions.

Warning: This article includes allegations of sexual assault and references to suicide some readers may find distressing.

ITV News and the Guardian newspaper said their joint investigation featured interviews with multiple women who gave first-hand accounts of Mr Walliams' conduct.

One woman alleged he sexually assaulted her at his house when she was 15, while others accused him of grooming them when they were teenagers.

The 55-year-old denied the allegations. 

He had sought a court injunction to bar the media from identifying him in their reporting.  

Mr Walliams' lawyers claimed that publication of sexual misconduct allegations would lead him to take his own life.

A judge rejected his injunction request last week, but protected his identity until late Monday.

'Not a sexual predator', Walliams says 

"I am not a sexual predator," Mr Walliams said, according to ITV News.

"I have not broken the law, but I am devastated that some of the women I met 10 to 20 years ago have now expressed hurt or anger towards me.

"Whilst a power imbalance is inevitable when one party is famous, abusing that power is something else entirely and it is something that I never did."

Mr Walliams' lawyer, Sara Mansoori, had previously told the UK's High Court that he had tried to take his life when he received letters from ITN and Guardian News and Media seeking his response to the allegations.

He later made another attempt, she said, and he was recently admitted to the hospital for psychiatric care.

The case has drawn widespread attention in Britain because it highlighted questions over public figures' right to privacy and what media can report on the basis of public interest.

Gavin Millar, representing the media companies, has said that the allegations were gathered after "a wide-ranging and rigorous investigation" and that there was a strong public interest in publishing them.

He told the court that the investigation involved speaking to more than 100 people, including 30 sources with first-hand accounts of his conduct.

"The defendants allege that, over a period of years, the claimant used his status and influence as a well-known public figure to establish contact with young women, some considerably younger than him, and that he engaged or sought to engage in seriously inappropriate conduct," according to a summary of the court judgement.

Some of the alleged conduct could amount to criminal offences if proven, the judgement said.

Injunction would seriously interfere with media rights, judge says

In dismissing the injunction bid, Justice Matthew Nicklin said such a legal measure would mean "an exceptionally serious interference" with the rights of the media companies.

He noted that Mr Walliams had a "serious and longstanding psychiatric vulnerability" which must be taken seriously, and said a decision allowing the allegations to be published will substantially increase his risk of suicide. 

He went on to say that the evidence did not "establish that suicide is inevitable".

Mr Walliams was dropped last year by publisher HarperCollins after allegations were made of inappropriate behaviour. 

Few details were published at the time, but the Guardian reported on Tuesday that there were concerns about his behaviour for years, including an allegation that he had an inappropriate sexual relationship with a junior female employee.

Mr Walliams also left his role as a judge on 'Britain's Got Talent' in 2022 after apologising for making "disrespectful comments" about auditioning contestants.