InquirerLeonen seeks zero tolerance for court corruptionRTP DesportoGonçalo Ramos volta a adiantar PortugalESPN DeportesFever vs. Aces: Caitlin Clark, A'ja Wilson y las claves del Juego 3Daily MaverickCOLLECTIVE WELLBEING: Renewable energy was promised as a path to prosperity — what happened?ESPNWemby won't promote betting sites: 'I want to inspire in a good way'The Jerusalem PostIn their own voice: How Iran’s citizens documented January's massacres in Manoto documentaryBBC NewsPutin warns West that Russia is ready to use every weapon to protect KaliningradStraits Times SportIreland v Austria game briefly halted by Stop the Game protestersEl TiempoRevuelo en redes sociales: pasajeros de un vuelo de Avianca denunciaron que pasaron la noche en el piso tras demora en la ruta de Bucaramanga- BogotáRolling Stone‘The Celebrity Traitors UK Season 2’ Isn’t Available in the U.S., But We Found a Way to StreamLa PresseLes ministres de la Santé provinciaux demandent à Ottawa de renouveler du financementSRF NewsKrieg in der Ukraine – Russische Drohnen treffen Schule und Südbrücke in Kiew
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Judge dismisses antitrust lawsuits over Google’s AI Overviews

Translate

Rolling Stone’s parent company and Chegg claimed Google’s AI search features drove away traffic from their sites.

Rolling Stone’s parent company and Chegg claimed Google’s AI search features drove away traffic from their sites.

by

STK093_GOOGLE_A

Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge

Emma Roth

is a news writer who covers the streaming wars, consumer tech, crypto, social media, and much more. Previously, she was a writer and editor at MUO.

A federal judge has dismissed a pair of antitrust lawsuits filed by Chegg and Rolling Stone parent company Penske Media Corporation, which accused Google of driving away web traffic with its AI-powered search features, as reported earlier by Reuters. US District Judge Amit Mehta takes Google’s side in a ruling on Wednesday, writing that PMC and Chegg’s claims don’t stand up to antitrust law.

In lawsuits filed last year, Chegg and PMC accused Google of abusing its monopoly power by coercing publishers into supplying content for AI Overviews for free, or risk disappearing from search results. The publishers alleged Google’s practices diverted traffic away from their sites, hurting their revenue.

Judge Mehta, who made a landmark antitrust ruling against Google in 2024, disagrees with Chegg and PMC’s claims. “Plaintiffs have pleaded only that they have an ‘expectation’ that Google will send them search ​traffic if they make their content available for free,” Mehta writes. “But an expectation is not an agreement. It is simply how a general search engine works.”

Mehta adds that the court is not “unsympathetic to the situation publishers now find themselves in,” but writes that antitrust rules can’t replace a legislative body’s decision to address the economic impact of “new innovation.”

Meanwhile, publishers continue to see effects of Google’s AI-powered search overhaul, with traffic to news outlets and small websites taking a steep dive. This week, The Information reported that Google is paying around 100 publishers for their contributions to AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Gemini as part of a pilot program.

Disclosure: The Verge is part of Penske Media.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

View the original on The Verge →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.