ESPNWorld Series Game 3: Takeaways from Brewers' historic blowout of RaysESPN DeportesEl 'challenge' que valió 8 carreras y casi sella un Serie MundialPunchStepmother, 19-year-old arrested over Bauchi children’s deathsDaily MaverickJay-Z to headline next year’s Super Bowl halftime showThe Jerusalem PostPM Netanyahu's cousin refuses to vote for Likud, cites party's 4 sins in 'moral-public sphere'InquirerNegros traders, labor groups assail wage increaseUOLMauricio Moura defende Bolsa Família: "Programa é exemplo de sucesso"ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSportstarRanji Trophy LIVE score today: Badoni, Sumit build on partnership for Delhi; Andre Siddarth falls for TN; Round 3, Day 2 updates中国新闻网A股午评:超3700只个股飘绿,三大指数收跌GIGAZINEAIブームでデータセンター向け機材の窃盗が相次ぐ、被害総額は6月以降だけで150億円以上The South AfricanWEATHER TODAY: Level 4 alert for flooding storms in eastern KZN, 38°C in Musina
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 27, 2026

'Unanimity doesn't mean rules were followed': Congress leader rejects ECI affidavit amid CEC row

Translate

Unanimity did not establish whether the decisions complied with the rules, the Congress said on Monday after the Election Commission of India (ECI) submitted an affidavit in Supreme Court, saying the three commissioners had unanimously approved its decisions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

“The Supreme Court should summon all the relevant records. Even if all three agreed, the core issue remains ‘Form 6’,” Congress leader Imran Masood said, questioning whether a decision could be considered lawful merely because all three Election Commissioners had agreed to it.

The remarks came even as the poll panel denied amending the statutory Form 6 used for enrolling new voters.

“The question is whether the decision was taken in accordance with the rules,” he said, adding “If all three act arbitrarily, does that mean the decision is no longer arbitrary?”

What ECI told Supreme Court

In its affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on Monday, the ECI informed the Supreme Court that all decisions relating to the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by its three members, rejecting allegations that chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted unilaterally or that the poll panel violated the law governing its decision-making process.

The poll panel also denied amending the statutory Form 6, arguing that the additional declaration required during the SIR was a separate document prescribed through its orders and not a modification of the form.

Opposition rejects ECI's affidavit

When asked whether the ECI’s affidavit was a setback for the Opposition, Masood said, “The question is about Form 6. The question is about the deletion of votes. How has the issue been resolved? The issue is not the Election Commissioner. The issue is vote theft.”

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, meanwhile, has called for a “Save the Vote – Save the Country” march and rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan on November 1. “Our votes are being stolen, and we will not tolerate this quietly under any circumstances,” he said in a post on X, urging people to join the march.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.