PunchMorning recap: Again, Nigerians lose savings to Ponzi scheme, Dangote refinery raises petrol gantry price, other top storiesESPN Deportes49ers extienden contrato de Shanahan, fuentesוואלהדיווח: ארה"ב תגביל את חלונות הזמן להגנה אווירית על מכליות במצר הורמוזESPNBen Shelton's shot at history comes Sunday in the US Open finalInquirerRidon to Sara Duterte: Attend Monday’s Senate impeachment trialХабрВы узнаете о клике через девять дней, и не от того, кто кликнулSözcüAmasya’da motosiklet bariyerlere çarptı: 18 yaşındaki sürücü hayatını kaybettiRapplerNew rules, new season: What to know about UAAP 2026-2027Cumhuriyetİzmir'in en uç noktasında saklanan el değmemiş cennet! Nergis kokulu sokakları ve turkuaz koyları ile Karaburun...InteriaPolski oficer w pojedynkę zatrzymał Niemców. Generał oddał mu własny orderLa NaciónUn geriátrico en Chile sufrió un incendio: hay al menos 16 muertos20 MinutenEinbrecher in der Villa – Thierry nimmt die Verfolgung auf
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 12, 2026

US state accuses L’Oreal of concealing cancer risks linked to hair relaxers

Translate

Arizona has sued L’Oreal SA and its US subsidiary, alleging the cosmetics company hid evidence that its hair relaxer products could cause cancer in women, as it faces thousands of similar lawsuits from users and their families.

Arizona Attorney General Kristin Mayes, a Democrat, filed the lawsuit late Thursday in state court, making Arizona the first state to sue over alleged cancer risks linked to hair relaxers. The lawsuit accuses L’Oreal of violating state consumer protection laws by marketing the products without warning consumers about the alleged risks of ovarian and uterine cancers.

The state is seeking penalties and damages, as well as a court order forcing L’Oreal to stop selling the products unless it warns of the cancer risk.

The lawsuit comes as the company faces more than 12,000 similar lawsuits filed by women or their families that have been consolidated in a Chicago federal court as part of a multidistrict litigation proceeding, a procedure designed to more efficiently manage lawsuits filed in multiple jurisdictions.

A spokesman for L’Oreal USA said the company is confident in the safety of its products and believes the claims are without legal or scientific merit.

A 2022 study

The products, which have been marketed under the names Dark and Lovely, Optimum and other brands, promise to permanently straighten textured hair.

The first lawsuits hit the docket after the 2022 release of a study done by the National Institutes of Health that found women who used the products several times a year were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer.

L’Oreal’s spokesman said Friday the study made no finding of a causal connection between the use of those products and any conditions alleged by the plaintiffs.

The lawsuits seek damages to compensate the women for their pain and suffering and economic damages for medical bills and the cost of the products, among other things.

The lawsuits name L’Oreal, as well as Revlon and other makers of the products. Revlon has also denied a connection between cancer and the products.

The multidistrict litigation continues to move forward, court records show, and trials could begin next year.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.