ESPN DeportesBarça: "Julián Álvarez es el pasado", dice DecoPunchItori plant drives Dangote Cement’s export expansionESPNFollow live: Penix finds Hooper for TD as Falcons extend lead over PackersThe Jerusalem PostPezeshkian says he met with Khamenei face to face, supreme leader healthy, giving direction한겨레‘억대 수익’ 탈세 유튜버 17명, 지난해 239억 추징당했다InquirerFrom Araneta to Baguio: Blessed Fulton Sheen’s ties to PHUOLParticipante do 1º pleito com voto feminino no Brasil, eleitora de 100 anos tende a votar em LulaSözcüAllah’a emanet yaşıyoruzG1Veja o que fizeram os candidatos ao governo do AM nesta quinta-feira (24)ABC News (Australia)Thousands of Queensland child safety workers to walk off the jobSportstarAsian Games 2026 Live Updates, Day 7: India confirms mixed doubles medals in table tennis and squash; Suruchi-Kamaljeet qualify for 10m air pistol mixed team final; badminton scoresLa NaciónTrabajaba con su tractor, detectó algo que brillaba en la tierra y lo que encontró le cambió la vida para siempre
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 25, 2026

US seeks to join Musk’s fight against EU fine

Translate

The European Commission fined X for breaching transparency obligations, using deceptive design and denying researchers access to public data. (EPA Images pic)
WASHINGTON:

The US on Thursday asked the EU’s General Court to let it intervene on the side of Elon Musk and his social media platform X, which are seeking to overturn a fine for breaching the bloc’s online content rules.

Musk and X, formerly known as Twitter, are challenging a 120-million-euro penalty imposed by Brussels under its landmark digital rules.

The US justice department said it had filed an application at the EU’s second-highest court backing Musk and X’s bid to annul the European Commission’s December 2025 decision, the first fine ever issued under the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The DSA, which fully took effect in 2024, requires online platforms to do more to tackle illegal and harmful content and to be more transparent about how their systems work.

Violations can bring fines of up to six percent of a company’s global annual turnover.

The law has become a flashpoint between Washington and Brussels. President Donald Trump’s administration and the US tech industry have cast it as a tool of censorship, a charge the EU rejects.

“The European Commission inappropriately attempted to expand its regulatory authority to reach American companies not present or operating within its jurisdiction,” said Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate.

“We will not tolerate the European Commission engaging in regulatory overreach to try and control American engines of innovation and economic growth,” he added.

The commission fined X for breaching transparency obligations, using deceptive design in its paid blue checkmark system and denying researchers access to public data.

Trump called the fine censorship, and a few weeks later the US state department announced sanctions on five people, including former EU commissioner Thierry Breton.

X, whose EU headquarters are in Ireland, filed its appeal in February, arguing that the fine violated its due process rights. But the company has also moved to comply with the decision.

In July, the commission accepted X’s plan to remedy the violations, which includes widening researchers’ access to data, such as advertising information, with the changes subject to an independent audit.

X had already relabeled its blue checkmarks “premium” instead of “verified.”

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.