InquirerMimaropa drug bust in Palawan yields ₱51,884 worth of ‘shabu’PunchMadrid apologise to Chinese people over Mbappé’s commentsThe Jerusalem PostIDF kills three terrorists in Gaza, including Hamas Nukhba who kidnapped Alexander Dancyg on Oct. 7Daily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: Asparagus spears with rosemary-infused Parmesan butter creamESPNThe joy and pain that define baseball were in full force in Rays' incredible Game 4 winColliderMichael Bay’s ‘Black Hawk Down’ Replacement Officially Has a New Streaming BaseCapital FMRights groups sue State over alleged political violence ahead of 2027 pollsThe RegisterNeocloud thinks AI agents - not meatbags - will be its main customersZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioGhaflaLynn Ngugi Defends Mercy Masika’s Biblical Wife Masterclass Amid BacklashNHK 社会熊本地震3か月 イオン 一部エリア営業再開の意向 遺族に示すالنهارأستراليا تُشدّد الرقابة على مستحضرات الواقي من الشمس
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Tata being ‘criminally destroyed’; no business leader dares to say a word: Rahul Gandhi

Translate

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said the Tata Group is being “criminally destroyed” and that no business leader dares to say a word, questioning how long they will remain silent.

“Tata is being criminally destroyed, and no business leader dares say a word. How long will you stay silent? Until they own you? Indian business is not Modi and Shah’s plaything. You lack courage. We don’t. We will ensure justice for these crimes,” he said in a post on X.

There was no immediate response from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) or Tata Group. The copy will be updated when they respond.

Gandhi’s post came amid a power struggle between the holding company Tata Sons and the controlling shareholder, Tata Trusts, of one of the country’s oldest conglomerates.

Tata Trusts chairperson Noel Tata opposed the September 17 resolution to reappoint N Chandrasekaran as the executive chairman of Tata Sons for a further term of five years upon the expiry of his current term. He argued that the board used a different constitutional route from the one followed when Chandrasekaran was reappointed in 2022.

The Trusts contend that the affirmative support of a majority of their nominee directors was a condition for a valid resolution and that a chairman’s casting vote could not overcome the failure to meet that condition.

Tata Sons has relied on a different reading of Articles 104B, 118 and 121 of the company’s Articles of Association (AoA), including the provision for a casting vote in case of equality of votes. Legal opinions the two sides obtained have taken divergent views on whether Article 118 applies to the reappointment of an incumbent chairman and on the operation of the casting vote.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.