CNN Türk‘Vanlı Kara Haydar’a yeni operasyon! 934 milyonluk soru işareti: İki otomobilden servet çıktıPunchMorning recap: Fresh court battles brew over primaries, Why Yayi changed his name, other top storiesThe Jerusalem PostSeventeen killed in mass shooting at South Africa tavern, police launch manhunt for suspectsESPNProjecting the CFP top 12 after Week 4: Gators claw into contentionInquirerCalapan–Batangas ferry fares rise, operators cite fuel price surgeDaily MaverickWORLD NEWS DAY OP-ED: Journalism and our chaotic world’s future한겨레코인, 정치적 내러티브를 잃다 [헬로, 크립토]SözcüErdoğan'ın 'kafadan sıkıntılı' dediği muhalif vekil AKP'ye geçiyorRTL BoulevardEddy Zoëy maakt musicaldebuut na zwaar jaar: 'Ben nog steeds herstellende'Collider2026's Best Survival Horror Movie Officially Passes a Major Streaming MilestoneRappler‘An Sayaw nin mga Salampati’ and Bicol’s unwavering fight for human rightsHipertextualTodos los comandos de Linux siempre a mano con esta app para iOS y Android
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 27, 2026

Lacson hits DPWH chief’s remark on Taguig projects

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — Sen. Panfilo “Ping” Lacson on Sunday dared Public Works and Highways Secretary Vince Dizon to explain how an infrastructure project in Taguig City, which supposedly contained coordinates pointing outside verified project limits, should not be flagged as a “ghost” project.

This followed Dizon’s earlier statement that there are “no ghost projects” in Taguig City.

READ: No ghost projects in Taguig – Dizon

Article continues after this advertisement

In a social media post, Lacson cited a supposed finding of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) regarding “geotagged photographs attached to billing reports contained coordinates pointing outside verified project limits.”

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

For instance, the senator said, “Metadata of Contract ID 220B0106 reflected coordinates located approximately 600 kilometers away in LEYTE PROVINCE.”

“Sec. Vince Dizon, please explain how this finding of your own team should not be flagged as a ghost project in Taguig,” Lacson said, emphasizing, “Since when has Taguig been located in Leyte?”

Lacson also pointed out that the project was allegedly contracted by St. Timothy Construction Corp., owned by contractor couple Curlee and Sarah Discaya, who are currently facing charges in connection with alleged irregularities surrounding flood-control projects in Bulacan and Davao Occidental, respectively.

READ: Curlee Discaya moved to Bulacan jail over graft case

Article continues after this advertisement

“What do you say about this, Sec?” Lacson told the DPWH chief.

The Inquirer reached out to Dizon regarding the senator’s post, but he has yet to respond as of posting time.

Article continues after this advertisement

During the Senate finance subcommittee’s hearing on the DPWH budget on Friday, Dizon was asked by Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano if there are any “ghost” projects in his bailiwick, Taguig City.

“Are there any ghost projects in Taguig?” Cayetano asked, to which Dizon responded, “In our investigation, none.”

The DPWH said it has recorded 107 projects in Taguig, all of which have “accomplishments.”

After the hearing, Lacson said in a separate social media post on Saturday that Dizon’s “pressure” of his work as DPWH chief “may have clouded his memory.”

“The DPWH already turned over to my Senate office records of non-existent but reported as completed slope protection projects in Taguig. Like toothpaste squeezed from the tube, there’s no putting it back in,” the senator said.

Lacson and Cayetano have tussled over alleged flood control irregularities in Taguig City over the past weeks.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Lacson recently released records of supposed “ghost” projects and “misused” public funds in reclamation areas in the city, but Cayetano has repeatedly denied it. /gsg

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.