CNN TürkTrabzonspor’da Nwaiwu’ya derbi uyarısıInquirerPsychological first aid eyed for South Cotabato school communityESPNOregon wins in 84-0 rout despite missing 2 key players on offenseThe Jerusalem PostInside the Houthi advance: How Iran's allies are helping tighten Tehran's grip on the Red SeaPunchMeet 13 new players in Chelle’s latest Super Eagles call-upsBollywood HungamaYeh Prem Mol Liya: Himesh Reshammiya to launch title track of Ayushmann Khurrana, Sharvari starrer live with 25-piece orchestra on September 20Screen Rant6 Hercule Poirot Movie Mysteries Ranked By How Clever The Killer's Plan Actually Is20 MinutenFans begeistert: So ähnlich sehen sich Aran und Cillian MurphyDaily Mail'I'm a professional middle-aged woman in a stable marriage - but I'm horrified by my sleazy erotic dreams.' BEL MOONEY explains what they REALLY meanComplete SportsSPORTS PLANET Podcast…EPISODE 140: Madrid Derby PreviewMintSpiceJet flights delayed at Delhi Airport over ‘operational’ issues, leaving passengers stranded: What airline saidColliderAlan Ritchson’s Reacher Franchise Is Officially Taking Over the World on Prime Video
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 19, 2026

Jehovah’s Witnesses announce adjustment to blood transfusion policy

Translate
Jehovah’s Witnesses announce adjustment to blood transfusion policy

Blood transfusion. Photo: BBC

The Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses has announced that members can now decide whether to accept or donate the four main components of blood based on their personal conscience.

The organisation made this known in a statement issued by its World Headquarters in Warwick, New York and made available on its website on Friday.

According to the statement, “the decision to accept red cells, white cells, plasma or platelets from another person’s blood is a matter of personal conscience.”

It added that “each Witness must decide whether or not to donate blood for the clearly expressed purpose of providing components or fractions for use by another person.”

However, the organisation said its position on whole-blood transfusion had not changed.

“The long-standing refusal of whole-blood transfusions on religious grounds, a core teaching based on the command to ‘abstain from blood’ (Acts 15:20), is unchanged,” the statement said.

International spokesman for Jehovah’s Witnesses at the organisation’s World Headquarters, Paul Gillies, said, “Blood remains sacred to Jehovah’s Witnesses, who continue to regard life and blood as precious gifts from God.

“We recognise that medical decisions involving blood components are a matter of conscience between each Witness and their God, Jehovah.”

The organisation said the adjustment “follows earlier updates regarding blood fractions and the use of one’s own blood during medical procedures.”

It added, “Since the Bible does not comment on such decisions, they are a matter of individual conscience. That same reasoning has now been extended to the four main components of blood.”

On medical care, the statement said, “Jehovah’s Witnesses love life and want the best available medical care. They do not practise faith healing, and they seek out doctors who can provide effective treatment in accord with their wishes, values and beliefs.”

Gillies said local congregations would not interfere in members’ personal decisions.

“Congregations do not involve themselves in personal decisions that rest with the individual conscience. We will continue to respect and support the personal decisions of our fellow believers.

“We are grateful, too, for the many skilled and compassionate physicians who provide quality medical care that respects our personal wishes regarding blood,” he said.

The organisation said Jehovah’s Witnesses number “over nine million worldwide, in congregations across more than 200 lands.”

In March, PUNCH reported that the religious group had clarified its position on the use of a member’s own blood during surgery and other medical procedures.

The clarification allowed individual Witnesses to decide whether their blood could be removed, stored and returned to them during medical treatment, while the organisation maintained its position against receiving blood from another person.

View the original on Punch

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.