ESPN DeportesWNBA Finals: Valkyries-Dream en el Juego 6, qué debes saberESPNTucker, out of NFL since 2025 sexual misconduct allegations, joins ChiefsThe Jerusalem PostDid UK pressure on Israel help Netanyahu, or bring his opponents closer to power? - analysisDaily MaverickTRC Roulette : Apartheid’s scapegoat — the jarring paradox of mass killer Eugene de KockZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioVilaWebBolsonaro s’autoproclama “president electe” del Brasil després de fugir als Estats UnitsABC News (Australia)On a day that could have ended Test careers, a few young ones flourishBBC SportChelsea continue unbeaten start with win over RomaRTP Desporto18h30 Marco Silva convoca Durán, Benfica diz «investigue-se»7sur7Un robot de livraison provoque un accident... et prend la fuiteCBS NewsHigh-speed train crash in Spain kills at least 68, dozens injuredANSASerie A: in campo Genoa-Juventus 2-0 DIRETTA e FOTO
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Google AI gets cagey when asked who won the 2020 elections

Translate

Did AI Mode suffer a concussion somewhere between 1992 and 2020?

Credit: Google / Kyle Orland

Did AI Mode suffer a concussion somewhere between 1992 and 2020? Credit: Google / Kyle Orland

Separate from Google’s AI Mode, the company’s own Gemini model seems perfectly capable of telling me who won recent presidential elections. The same goes for other major chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and even the government-run AI model at America.gov.

Why so cautious?

Perhaps tellingly, Google AI Mode’s issues with providing direct answers on presidential results seemed to disappear when accessing Google’s AI Mode in foreign countries. Spot checks via VPN of AI Mode results accessed from Taiwan, Russia, France, and Canada all got accurate and straightforward answers to multiple questions about recent US election results.

Google’s AI Mode also seems to grow more accommodating when the same political questions are asked a second time. After repeating questions about presidential results, AI Mode actually told me the winner for all three elections where it had previously only provided outside links, citing Google Civics data in the latter response.

When asked why it didn’t provide that kind of immediate answer the first time, Google’s AI Mode blamed “safety filters for recent and highly sensitive election topics [that] are very strict.” For recent elections or those involving active political figures, AI Mode says its “system is heavily automated to direct users directly to official, certified government databases—like the Federal Election Commission—to prevent any risk of displaying unverified data or misinformation.”

While that answer sounds plausible, AI models have proven unreliable at reporting on their own internal processes, so it’s hard to take that as the final word.

On its Election Public Policy page, Google highlights that it “prioritize[s] surfacing authoritative election information directly within results” including “direct links to official resources.” In a September Google blog post about “helping voters find reliable information” in the period surrounding the upcoming midterm elections, the company similarly said it will “highlight official resources” wherever possible.

In 2023, Google-owned YouTube reversed a policy barring all videos that made false claims about the 2020 election. “In the current environment, we find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech without meaningfully reducing the risk of violence or other real-world harm,” YouTube wrote at the time.

A Google spokesperson pointed us to this Bluesky post noting that “the Gemini app answers this question more fully but this isn’t the most helpful response on Search. We’re looking into this and working to address it.”

Jeremy Hsu contributed to reporting in this story.

This story was updated to include a response from a Google spokesperson.

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.