ESPNBruins, Oilers each get pair of Germany gamesThe Jerusalem PostIsraeli man missing in Japan for over three weeks, authorities seek public's assistance in searchPunchNDLEA discovers fentanyl chemical in Ogun meth laboratory, arrests 10ESPN DeportesPrevia gigante de Premier League 2026-27: análisis equipo por equipoRTP DesportoPortugal estreia-se no Comité Executivo dos Jogos do MediterrâneoBollywood HungamaBhagyashri Borse NOT starring opposite Aditya Roy Kapur in Milap Zaveri film; T-Series confirmsוואלההחות'ים טוענים: תקפנו יעד "רגיש" בסעודיה ומתקני ארמקוDaily MaverickGROUNDUP: Families living in Joburg stadium trapped among rubbish and ratsBillboard‘Weird Al’ Yankovic Rocks NPR’s Tiny Desk With All-Parodies Set: ‘We Did So Great They Invited Us Back 16 Years Later!’Screen RantThe Walking Dead's Steven Yeun Returns To Supernatural Thrillers For New Netflix SeriesSBS 뉴스"사후 상의, 반발 불러"…"비거주 예외 일부 확대"TagesschauWest-Nil-Virus: 157 Fälle in Griechenland gemeldet
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, August 20, 2026

Why do hard-sell beauty tactics persist in Hong Kong – and when can consumers fight back?

Translate

From arrests linked to the Hong Kong operations of beauty chain Opatra London to a surge in online complaints against other skincare brands, high-pressure sales tactics remain widespread and continue to take a toll on consumers.

Why do such malpractices remain widespread despite the city’s Trade Descriptions Ordinance, which criminalises aggressive commercial practices that significantly impair a consumer’s freedom of choice?

The South China Morning Post spoke to legal experts about common hard-sell scenarios, how shoppers can protect themselves and where the legal line is drawn.

1. Paid to escape? You can still report it

Lawyers say sales encounters without any physical contact can still amount to an offence, as courts could rule that a consumer’s freedom of choice was “significantly impaired” in such scenarios.

“The question is whether the conduct as a whole amounted to harassment, coercion or undue influence that significantly impaired the consumer’s freedom of choice and caused the consumer to make a purchase that he or she would not otherwise have made,” commercial lawyer Kenix Yuen Pui-kwan told the SCMP.

Lawyer Eric Chan Pak-ho said “undue influence” under the law means exploiting one’s position of power over the consumer to apply pressure, without needing to use or threaten physical force.

A branch of Opatra London on Russell Street in Causeway Bay. Photo: Nora Tam

A branch of Opatra London on Russell Street in Causeway Bay. Photo: Nora Tam
View the original on South China Morning Post

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.