ESPN'She never stopped encouraging me': How Dawn Staley refused to let hearing loss hinder Ayla McDowellThe Jerusalem PostIDF kills two Hamas terrorists who participated in Oct. 7 massacre, held Israeli hostagesInquirerVeloso’s mom in disbelief after Marcos’ absolute pardonESPN DeportesRaphinha explica cómo Flick le cambió la vida: "Me iba a ir del Barcelona"Daily MaverickCriminal Syndicate: Hawks official arrested for kidnappings linked to Gqeberha prosecutor murder accusedBollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Lust Stories 3 producer Ashi Dua says they expected a “serious” story from Kiran Rao; reveals multiple ideas from Vikramaditya Motwane, Shakun Batra; calls Vishal Bhardwaj a “complete trooper”Collider'Daredevil: Born Again' Star Officially Reacts to Shock Disney+ CancellationThe IndependentPolice watchdog says Met should investigate itself over arrest of 'Putney pusher' suspectABC NewsTracking the nor'easter: Your forecast for this weekendLa PresseContre Mark Carney et le roi Charles III | Un homme de Québec accusé de menaces de mortRai NewsVela, è di Arc il primo successo della Louis Vuitton Cup: il video dell'arrivo7sur7Menaces de crues catastrophiques: un nouvel ouragan s’approche d’Hawaï
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 25, 2026

Police watchdog says Met should investigate itself over arrest of 'Putney pusher' suspect

Translate

The Metropolitan Police should investigate itself over the arrest of Nicholas Brandram, who the force suspected of being the so-called “Putney pusher”, the Independent Office for Police Conduct says.

Mr Brandram, 44, was found dead at his home earlier this month. He had been under investigation by the force for the 2017 incident, in which a jogger shoved a woman into the path of an oncoming bus on London’s Putney bridge.

He was arrested on suspicion of attempted grievous bodily harm in connection with the case in June this year and released under investigation in early September.

Police said the death was “unexpected”, and was not believed to be suspicious.

Mr Brandram’s family has insisted that he was innocent, and believe the former army captain took his own life after the Metropolitan Police failed to formally clear his name.

They said that he was living with “shame, anxiety and humiliation” as a result of the investigation.

“There was no forensic evidence linking Nick to it, no evidence placing him on Putney Bridge at that time, and no credible evidence that he was the man shown in the footage. In fact, the evidence proved the opposite,” they said.

“Despite that, the police chose to arrest Nick rather than invite him to attend for interview. They searched his home and the Met Police press team then released information which inevitably led to speculation and Nick being identified in subsequent reporting.”

They said that the police were repeatedly asked to end their investigation and were warned about the impact the investigation was having on Mr Brandram’s mental health.

Chief Superintendent Dan Knowles said earlier: “Our thoughts are with Mr Brandram’s family and friends at this deeply distressing time. We recognise the significant impact his death will have on those who knew and loved him. We also understand the strain that being subject to a police investigation can place on individuals and their families.”

The force said that after Mr Brandram was released under investigation, officers’ enquiries into the offence continued.

Chf Supt Knowles said: “This remains the position, and further investigative work is ongoing. Investigations of this nature, particularly those involving complex evidential and forensic work, can take a number of months to complete as officers gather and assess all available evidence.”

In a statement on Friday, the IOPC said: “We received a mandatory referral from the Metropolitan Police on 16 September relating to prior contact officers had with Nicholas Brandram, who was sadly declared deceased on 15 September.

“After carefully considering the referral, we have decided that an investigation is required and that the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards should conduct it.

“We have recommended the review considers matters including the necessity and proportionality of arrest, what engagement was there with the media and considerations made in relation to Mr Brandram’s welfare and the relevant policy.

“Should the investigation conclude without identifying any potential misconduct for any officer involved, the force’s final investigation report must be submitted to the IOPC for review, to ensure independent oversight.”

This is a breaking news story. More follows. Subscribe here to get the latest updates from The Independent.

View the original on The Independent →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.