The Jerusalem PostTrump’s Gaza peace plan faces a bigger threat than a pre-election clash with Netanyahu - opinionESPN DeportesOhtani pasa a IL; Dodgers convocan a De Paulaוואלהבתום מצוד: לוחמי יחידת דובדבן עצרו מחבל שתכנן לבצע פיגוע יריESPN⚾ MLB Power Rankings: Which teams are rising? Which are falling?CNN TürkCNN TÜRK Tayvan'ın savunma sistemlerini görüntülediRTP Desporto18h30 A forma de Prestianni e o “efeito” PalhinhaPunchLagos-Ibadan expressway commuters lament as Kara-Berger bridge repairs trigger massive gridlockInquirerBrian Poe, Margarita Gutierrez share blessings before wedding dayBBC SportCricket: Today at the TestScreen RantSyfy's 5-Season Space Opera Is Everything Firefly Should Have BeenColliderCollider Media Studio Officially Returns to TIFF for a Star-Studded Weekend
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 10, 2026

Taguig prosecutors dismiss Sara Duterte’s perjury case vs Ramil Madriaga

Translate

MANILA, Philippines —  The Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office has dismissed the perjury complaints filed by Vice President Sara Duterte against Ramil Madriaga, her alleged former aide.

In a 19-page resolution released on Thursday, the prosecutors junked Duterte’s complaint against Madriaga due to “insufficiency of evidence.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“While complainant has presented evidence disputing respondent’s assertions, the evidence presently on record does not establish prima facie, with reasonable certainty of conviction, that respondent knowingly and willfully made materially false statements under oath in violation of Article 183 of the Revised Penal Code,” the Taguig Prosecutor’s Office said in the resolution.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

READ: Sara Duterte files another perjury case vs Madriaga

“Accordingly, the Complaint must be dismissed for insufficiency of evidence,” the prosecutor added.

The Inquirer reached out to Duterte’s camp regarding the resolution, but they have yet to respond to the query.

It was in March when Duterte filed her first perjury complaint before the Taguig Prosecutor’s Office against Madriaga after her supposed former aide submitted an affidavit to the Office of the Ombudsman claiming that he had delivered large sums of money to different people under her instructions.

Article continues after this advertisement

Madriaga likewise claimed that upon Duterte’s directive, he organized ISIP (Inday Sara Is My President) Pilipinas for her planned presidential bid in 2022, which was allegedly funded by Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators and drug dealers. 

The vice president denied the accusation, maintaining that she had neither personal nor professional dealings with Madriaga, and that his claim of having served as her “bagman’’ or courier for diverted confidential funds was false.

Article continues after this advertisement

Duterte filed another perjury complaint in the same office August consisted of approximately 1,000 pages, which “thoroughly exposes Madriaga’s malicious and deliberate falsehoods.”

‘The truth still prevail’

Madriaga’s counsel, Atty. Mark Anthony Te said in a statement that the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office’s resolution is “important vindication” of Duterte’s alleged former aide’s position.

“It should serve as a source of renewed confidence for the Filipino people that our institutions can still rise above personalities and political power, and that when the evidence is fairly examined, the truth can still prevail,” Te said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

“The pursuit of truth and justice is rarely easy, especially when one is made to stand against powerful interests. But this Resolution demonstrates that power does not have the final word. Evidence does. The law does,” he added. /mr

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.