The Jerusalem PostSpain’s prime minister blames Israel, Russia for disinformation around Ceuta border crisisESPN DeportesRally con jonrones al hilo mantiene a Yankees con ventajaESPN👏 OBJ reclaims iconic No. 13 jerseyוואלהדיווח: צבא ארה"ב תקף שתי מכליות איראניותInquirerOne of 3 justices opposes move to drop Bonoan from plunder caseEl Comercio¿Menos hijos, más mascotas? El cambio en las familias peruanas que obliga a las empresas a reinventarseLenta.ruЗахарова назвала угрозу мировому порядкуSBS 뉴스의원직 사퇴 여부 거듭 묻자 "청문회 잘 준비하겠다"Daily MailBurnham will NOT commit to 3% defence timetable: Plans to meet target will be under wraps until spending review in 2027ABC NewsMass. Sen. Ed Markey will defeat Rep. Seth Moulton in Democratic primary, AP projectsRapplerLIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of Vice President Sara DuterteSeeking AlphaDell signals FY2027 revenue of $192B and EPS of $25.50 as AI backlog reaches $95B
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Trump asks SCOTUS to allow immediate firing of 29 trans military service members

Translate

The members' case challenging the Pentagon ban goes to trial in January.

August 31, 2026, 2:57 PM

Calling it a matter of "exceptional importance," the Trump administration has filed an urgent appeal with the Supreme Court seeking the immediate removal of 29 active-duty service members who are transgender even before their case challenging the Pentagon ban goes to trial in January. 

Several courts have found that the ban was likely rooted in animus and violates servicemembers constitutional rights to due process and equal protection – a conclusion the government strongly disputes.   

While the justices last year gave Trump the green light to move forward broadly with a ban on service members who have a history of gender dysphoria, federal judges in a separate case, U.S. v. Talbott, last June blocked the military from discharging more than two dozen individual plaintiffs who brought the lawsuit challenging the policy. 

The United States Supreme Court in Washington D.C.

STOCK PHOTO/Getty Images

Solicitor General John Sauer called the ruling allowing those plaintiffs to remain in their positions "gravely erroneous."

"The authority of the U.S. military to determine who may serve in the Nation’s armed forces is a matter of exceptional importance," Sauer wrote in the government's petition. "Whether the Constitution prohibits the military from exercising that authority by adopting a policy like the one here is a recurring issue, which has arisen before and will likely arise again absent this Court’s review. The Court should thus take this opportunity to address the constitutionality of the [Department of Defense Secretary] Hegseth policy and reverse the decision below, whose reasoning cannot be squared with this Court’s precedents or deference to the military."

The justices will consider this fall whether to hear the case at this early stage, before any final ruling on the merits by a lower court.

In the meantime, the 29 plaintiffs – who are active-duty, reservists, National Guard members and a person seeking to enlist – will remain in the force. 

"As the Trump administration’s own attorneys admitted, these are qualified individuals who are meeting all military standards," said Jennifer Levi, an attorney representing the transgender service members with the LGBTQ legal advocacy group GLAD Law. "There is no reason to waste millions of taxpayer dollars to kick out thousands of highly trained, skilled and decorated troops based on nothing but hostility and this administration’s political whims."

View the original on ABC News

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.