ESPN Deportes¿Cómo construyó América su camino al liderato?ESPNFollow live: Chuba Hubbard scores 15-yard TD to give Panthers the leadCNN TürkEŞREF TEK NE ZAMAN BAŞLAYACAK? Eşref Tek hangi kanalda yayınlanacak? Başrolde Çağatay Ulusoy var!PunchGreenwich Bank expands, opens three Lagos branchesThe Jerusalem PostZamir: IDF to overhaul intelligence, force readiness after October 7 investigations한겨레검이 운다 승리, 감이 온다South China Morning PostHKU eyes Northern Metropolis expansion to boost research capacity, attract talentUOLFlávio Bolsonaro ganha nos EUA com o dobro de votos de LulaZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFCBS NewsFlorida GOP governor candidate Byron Donalds courts skeptical Black votersRappler[OPINION] Stop asking where UHC will find the money. Build the economy that can pay for it.The Hollywood ReporterSo Long, Kody & Robyn: Where to Watch ‘Sister Wives’ Season 21 for Free Online Featuring Only the OG Spouses
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 5, 2026

SC: Marriage void due to false claims of cohabitation

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — Falsifying proof of cohabitation may be a ground for the nullification of an unlicensed marriage, according to the Supreme Court.

Ruling on a case concerning a couple in Antique, the high tribunal said the couple’s marriage was void from the beginning because their affidavit of cohabitation was falsely executed.

“As the records of this case show, there is inadequate evidence proving that (they) continuously and exclusively cohabited as husband and wife for a period of five years immediately preceding the celebration of their marriage,” it said in a 15-page decision penned by Associate Justice Henri Inting.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: 192 couples wed as oldest pair steals show at Ilagan mass wedding

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

The high court, which handed down the ruling on Feb. 24, but this was made public on Friday, upheld the separate rulings of the Court of Appeals in 2021 and 2022 and the regional trial court in San Jose, Antique, in 2016.

The case stemmed from a petition for the declaration of nullity the husband filed with the San Jose court in 2013, admitting that the affidavit of cohabitation he signed with his supposed wife was false as he had been working overseas for three years out of the six years they lived together.

The couple tried to contract a marriage without a license in May 2009, claiming that they had been residing in the same house since 2003, well within the minimum duration of five years required for a cohabitation to be declared a marriage.

Such a circumstance allows for marriages to be exempt from obtaining a license under Article 34 of the Family Code. The couple could instead execute an affidavit, which shall be approved by a solemnizing officer under oath to ensure that there are no legal obstacles to the marriage.

But the husband asserted that the marriage does not fall within the exemption stipulated in the law because they did not live together for straight years, including the years he was abroad for work. INQ

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.