The Jerusalem PostIsrael's 26th Knesset must restore dignity, accountability, and public trust - editorialInquirerWitness says Manases Carpio’s Davao lot in VP’s SALNPunchOutrage as 4,300 corps members cram into Ogun campDaily MaverickOP-ED: Get the right things done — How to make time for what matters most한겨레이사로 에너지바우처 끊긴 2만여가구, 정부가 재신청 돕는다ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioInquirer EntertainmentIñigo Pascual believes dad Piolo will find his person in God’s perfect timingCNN TürkATA'ya tükenmeyen sevgi, sonsuz saygı ve minnetStraits Times SportJabs of a different kind: Nurses to slug it out at charity boxing event #BRC001SRF NewsParallele zum Mensch – Auch Schimpansen müssen ihre Rufe lernenn-tvKomplizierte Rechenspiele: Dieses Horror-Szenario muss die Klopp-Elf unbedingt verhindernThe Sydney Morning HeraldElizabeth Laverty didn’t just collect art. She made a world around it
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 10, 2026

FACT CHECK: Marcos quote on P21 food threshold is fake

Translate

FACT CHECK: Marcos quote on P21 food threshold is fake

Marcos never said P21 per meal is sufficient for a family, contrary to the claim

AT A GLANCE

  • President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. did not make the claim that P21 per meal is sufficient for a family; this statement is falsely attributed to him.
  • The P21 figure is based on the Philippine Statistics Authority's poverty statistics, which indicate that individuals spending this amount are considered 'food poor.'
  • Critics argue that the P21 per meal figure does not accurately reflect the cost of a decent standard of living.

This is AI-generated. Read the article for full context. Report any errors.

Claim: President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. asserted that P21 per meal is already sufficient for one family, citing research.

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: Multiple Facebook users posted an alleged quote card from PTV News containing Marcos’ supposed statement.

The quote read: “Base sa aming research. Sapat na ang 21 pesos kada meal ng isang pamilya.” 

(Based on our research, P21 per meal is sufficient for a family.)

One Facebook user wrote in her caption, “Ganyan kaliit ang tingin sa mga mamamayan. Pwede na 21 pesos para sa isang pamilya. Wala halong lungkot, pag-aalala. Sapat na. The complacency and indifference of this government…”

(This shows how little they think of the people. They think P21 is enough for an entire family. Not a shred of sadness or concern — ‘it’s enough.’ The complacency and indifference of this government.)

Another Facebook user said in their caption, “Grabe naman yan BBM, 21 pesos kada meal?” 

(That’s unbelievable, BBM — P21 per meal?)

Combined, their posts had 8,800 reactions, 4,100 comments, and 5,500 shares as of writing.

The facts: The quote is falsely attributed to Marcos. There are no credible reports or announcements where he or the Palace made this statement.

The P21-per-meal figure made rounds online in 2024. The figure is based on the Philippine Statistics Authority’s (PSA) 2023 poverty statistics, which pegged the food threshold — the minimum amount for a family to meet their basic food needs — at P9,581 a month for a family of five. That comes out to around P63 per person per day, or P21 per meal. 

At the time, the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) said that individuals spending this amount and below for three meals a day are considered “food poor.”

Contrary to the claim, neither the Presidential Communications Office nor Marcos made any direct statement addressing the matter.

Rappler recently debunked a similar false claim that Marcos supposedly commented on the PSA’s 2025 poverty statistics, showing the poverty threshold at P96 per day.

Living standards: NEDA (now the Department of Economy, Planning, and Development) faced backlash in 2024 about the P21 per meal figure, with critics pointing out its unrealistic portrayal of how much Filipinos spend on food and the full picture of poverty in the Philippines.

The agency clarified that the P21 per meal metric does not reflect the cost of meals for a “decent standard of living” and is meant to serve as a measurement tool for the government’s poverty policies. (WATCH: Newsbreak Chats: The controversy over the so-called NEDA P21 meal)

In a statement in 2024, the agency’s secretary Arsenio Balisacan said, “They are not, and were never intended to be, prescribed budgets for a decent standard of living. They do not dictate how much a family should spend on food, nor do they provide an idea of a desirable household budget.” 

Meanwhile, the PSA said it would review the methodology for calculating the food poverty threshold, acknowledging that the P64 food budget per day is not reflective of actual food spending. – Eirene Manatlao/Rappler.com 

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

View the original on Rappler →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.