Daily MaverickOBITUARY: Ben Dekker — forester, actor, philosopher who stood for Parliament from a fruit barrowThe Jerusalem PostEisenkot warns Netanyahu against military action in Iran until new government is formedInquirerBOC: Nepomuceno still chief amid rumored leadership changesZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFGlobal NewsRussia, Ukraine to exchange prisoners but talks end with no big breakthrough3DNewsIBM утроила число кубитов в чипе Nighthawk — а в 2027 году создаст 1040-кубитовый квантовый суперкомпьютерBillboardThe LED Light Therapy Trend Is Getting Bigger, Literally. These Full-Body Devices Cover More Than Just Your Face20 Minuten«Die einen nutzen KI zu unreflektiert, die anderen zu wenig»ESPNMLB Awards Week: Who will win Cy Young Awards on Wednesday?BellaNaijaSeven New Tracks From Rema? E-Mortal Boy (EMB) Is Coming Next WeekDW EnglishFears of rising antisemitism in EuropeESPN DeportesLyonnes aumentan la ventaja ante Juventus con doblete de Katoto
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

NASA's secret weapon in the lunar space race may be ... procurement reform?

Translate

What has impressed Gold most about NASA’s strategy since announcing the Moon Base in March, at the Ignition event, has been the agency’s evolving procurement strategy. The space agency has adopted a flexible procurement strategy similar to one used by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

There are two components. NASA has largely used a mechanism called Broad Agency Announcements, which ask for a capability such as providing power on the surface of the Moon. This allows NASA to ask industry for ideas without being too prescriptive and levying a bunch of requirements. It’s rather like instead of telling industry precisely what it wants, NASA asks industry what it can do.

Critically, Gold said, the space agency has also used a DARPA-style preliminary proposal process. In response to a traditional procurement, interested companies would prepare a detailed proposal, often running dozens, if not hundreds, of pages. This required an extraordinary amount of time.

With the Moon Base, NASA is employing a two-step process. After NASA announces the need for a service, interested companies submit a short white paper describing their solution. After a short review, NASA identifies the concepts it wants to pursue further, and only then do companies invest the time and resources to prepare a detailed proposal.

Gold said several lunar opportunities interested Redwire, and the company submitted initial proposals in response. But it only had to prepare a full proposal for opportunities that NASA wanted to pursue, including using a variant of its roll-out solar arrays on the Moon to generate power.

“We were able to focus the lion’s share of our resources in what the agency really wanted and what we were best at,” he said.

An all-hands-on-deck approach

From this shift, it seems clear that NASA is trying to move away from micromanaging every individual lunar-base subsystem and instead seeks to coordinate independently developed commercial capabilities. The space agency is sourcing them from everywhere, from major contractors like Lockheed Martin, SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Northrop Grumman to relatively new startups such as Impulse Space, ispace-US, Voyager Technologies, Quantum Space, and more.

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.