Punch2027: Northern candidates should wait till 2031 to contest – Kano govThe Jerusalem Post'I'm responsible for hell': Ben-Gvir threatens Hamas terrorist behind 1996 bus bombingsDaily MaverickGROUNDUP: Gauteng government’s R144m gift to beauty training companyBollywood HungamaAnshuman Jha plans special screenings of Om Ka Hari across 15 cities as film enters week 2: "I want to keep walking that extra mile"Inquirer6 fugitives arrested in Northern MindanaoVarietyFlorence Pugh Speaks Out Over Cornell University Sexual Assault Case: ‘We Need Our Men to Be as Horrified and Sickened as Us’CNN TürkEnner Valencia'dan hat-trick! 3 golle skoru değiştirdiUOLColaboradora de María Corina Machado retorna à VenezuelaХабр«Мы больше не можем это взломать»: как Anthropic похоронила промпт-инъекции, но забыла про особенности AI-агентовNOSGezinsdrama in Vlaanderen, zoon (17) verdacht van moord op moeder en zusWirtualna PolskaTak mieli zarobić miliony. Kradli auta i rozkładali je na części7sur7Pourquoi l’hérédité ne dépend pas uniquement de l’ADN
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 28, 2026

Delhi Court Issues Notice In Appeal Against Brij Bhushan Singh's Acquittal

Translate

A Delhi court on Monday issued notice on the appeal filed by four women wrestlers against a magistrate's verdict acquitting former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The criminal appeal filed on September 25 has also assailed the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) assistant secretary Vinod Tomar of the criminal intimidation charge in the case.

Special Judge Dig Vinay Singh issued notice to Singh, Tomar and the state.

The matter has been posted for further proceedings on October 9.

On August 3 this year, the magisterial court acquitted former BJP MP and former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Singh in the sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers, including world championships medallist Vinesh Phogat, citing lack of evidence.

The court also acquitted Tomar.

According to wrestlers' plea filed on Friday, the acquittal was unsustainable in law, was founded on a "manifestly erroneous and selective appreciation" of the evidence on record, proceeded on conjectures and surmises, and "failed to apply binding and well-settled principles of law".

The plea claimed that a major portion of the magisterial court's judgment rested its reasoning on archaic and stereotypical assumptions about the expected behaviour of victims of sexual assault and harassment, instead of a fair and evidence-based assessment after taking into account the victims' circumstances.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

View the original on NDTV →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.