CNN TürkÖZET | Arda Güler frikikten perdeyi açtı; Real Madrid son dakikada kazandıPunchMan Utd, Villa target last 16 as Carabao Cup draw holds Wednesday nightInquirerAmici curiae at hand, Senate impeachment court revisits vote thresholdDaily MaverickBOOK EXCERPT: The Ego Trip: The promise and peril of the modern psychedelic boomוואלהגבר כבן 25 נפצע באירוע אלימות באום אל פחם - מצבו קשהESPNLet's kick off NFL Week 2: Seven things Solak thinks -- including that Houston's offense could be decentThe Jerusalem PostThree dead after helicopter crash in Los Angeles, fire department says한겨레4연패 향해 순항 이민성호, 7일간 휴식기에 조직력 더 다져야SözcüElektrik faturasını yarı yarıya düşüren taktik: Bu yöntemle her ay 1.500 TL daha az ödeniyorKhaosod EnglishStray dogs turn parked cars into their personal bedsBBC BusinessPetrol and diesel price rises push UK inflation higherDaily MailNew Sussex security fears: Duchess's mobile number leaks among parents at school their children had just started
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

SC grants petition urging Congress to pass law vs political dynasties

Translate
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of petitions seeking to compel Congress to pass a law on political dynasties.
Supreme Court building /INQUIRER PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of petitions seeking to compel Congress to pass a law on political dynasties.

READ: Marcos bent on approval anti-political dynasty bill before term ends

The full court decision penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul Hernando granted three consolidated petitions in GR numbers 263934, 272370, and 279201 filed by 1Sambayan Coalition—led by retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and retired Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales—along with groups of legal scholars and civic leaders.

Article continues after this advertisement

The petitions challenged Congress’s prolonged failure to pass a law defining and prohibiting political dynasties.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

In its ruling, SC spokesperson Atty. Camille Ting, said, “The Supreme Court unanimously declared that Article Two, Section 26 of the Constitution requires Congress to enact a law prohibiting political dynasties. The Supreme Court held that Congress’s failure to do so for thirty-nine years constitutes grave abuse of discretion.”

Article 2, Section 26 of the Constitution provides that the “State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law. 

Ting said the Supreme Court held that this provision is not merely an aspiration but a constitutional command.

It observed that “political dynasties have remained widespread and have extended even into the party-list system. Despite changes in the composition of Congress over the years, no comprehensive anti-political dynasty law has been enacted, implying either a lack of interest, avoidance for convenience, or service of self-interest. Although the Constitution does not set a deadline for Congress to enact the law, the Supreme Court held that this does not allow Congress to postpone its constitutional duty indefinitely.” /jpv

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.