ESPN DeportesNFL: Steelers pierde a Roman Wilson, fuenteESPNOverreacting to Week 5: Should Titans look for a new QB? Losing record for NFC East winner?PunchUNHCR sounds alarm over funding crisisThe Jerusalem PostOne killed, children among 24 wounded after ordnance explodes during northern Israel school tripDaily MaverickMADLANGA COMMISSION: Ipid searches Hawks officer’s home after Madlanga extrajudicial killing allegationsBollywood HungamaJailer 2 Hindi release: Makers clarify Rajinikanth-starrer will hit theatres on October 15; say, “There has been no change”ColliderForget ‘The Gentlemen,’ Guy Ritchie’s Gerard Butler Crime Thriller Is Officially Back in the Spotlight20 Minuten«Aus Spass wird Arbeit»: Community diskutiert über Kart-Emily (5)ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioIl Fatto Quotidiano“Gli metterò un cuscino sotto il sedere”: Toto Wolff prende in giro Antonelli, a Singapore ha rischiato la penalitàBusiness AMKremlin: Zelensky moet plaatsmaken om vrede mogelijk te makenAntara NewsHaze delays flights from Jayapura to Papua destinations
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 12, 2026

Most SAS personnel ‘refusing to answer’ questions from Afghanistan inquiry

Translate

The judge leading a statutory inquiry into alleged summary killings in Afghanistan has said most SAS personnel approached have refused to answer any of its questions.

Lord Justice Haddon-Cave is investigating allegations of more than 50 summary killings by UK special forces soldiers as well as claims of an alleged cover-up of illegal activity and inadequate investigations by the Royal Military Police.

In a public hearing, Haddon-Cave said a number of rule 9 requests – written notices asking for information – had been sent to SAS operators who were linked to the deliberate detention operations (DDOs) at the centre of allegations.

“The inquiry has identified numerous SAS personnel from whom it wishes to hear direct evidence as to the DDOs in question and has issued rule 9 requests for information to each of them,” he said.

“A high proportion have indicated their intention to rely on their privilege against self-incrimination and have refused to answer any questions asked by the inquiry.”

Haddon-Cave outside inquiry building
Lord Justice Haddon-Cave. Photograph: Jeff Moore/PA

Ministers announced the statutory judge-led inquiry after allegations that 54 Afghans were killed in suspicious circumstances by one SAS unit in Helmand province between 2010 and 2011 and accusations these amounted to war crimes.

A high court case brought by the law firm Leigh Day on behalf of one man, Saifullah, alleged that his father, two brothers and a cousin were killed during an SAS raid on a compound in southern Afghanistan in February 2011.

The inquiry is tasked with determining whether investigations conducted by the Royal Military Police were carried out properly and effectively and whether there is credible information that “numerous” killings were carried out by British armed forces between 2010 and 2013. The judge said the three-year period “sufficiently captures the allegations currently being made”.

The inquiry will also seek to determine whether the circumstances of the alleged killings were covered up at any stage and what lessons can be learned.

During Monday’s hearing, Haddon-Cave revealed the inquiry had obtained about 10,000 high-resolution photos, taken in the course of the DDOs, which do not appear to have formed part of Royal Military Police inquiries.

He said the inquiry was seeking evidence from Afghan families who lost loved ones during the detention operations, adding that the inquiry had heard “extensive” witness evidence regarding concerns and complaints raised by both UK special forces personnel and other individuals about the manner in which the SAS were conducting detention operations in Afghanistan during the period in question.

Last week, during a high court hearing, the Ministry of Defence identified material that suggested UK special forces personnel deployed on some operations being considered by the inquiry, may have committed serious offences under the Armed Forces Act 2006.

The open hearings continue and will take place throughout October and November.

View the original on The Guardian →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.