Daily MaverickBETS IN CLASS: Gambling regulators probe betting promotion at Pretoria preschoolThe Jerusalem PostZAKA, Chabad launch joint international disaster response and rescue unit for Jewish communitiesBollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Divya Dutta reflects on a memorable 2026 as Chiraiya, Gajab Raat and Last Man In Tower bring her diverse roles: “I have finally got my dues!”ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFThe South AfricanKaizer Chiefs to launch their own energy drink in DecemberSRF NewsKrieg im Nahen Osten – Mehrere Tote bei Angriff auf Spital in Gazaynet ספורטדקה 2: איטליה - צרפת 0:0BBC SportQuiz: Name England's all-time leading appearance makersVilaWebCarme Gomila enceta la campanya del 29-N: “El vot útil és el que serveix per a transformar les Illes i combatre l’especulació”ESPN DeportesItalia busca el liderato de su grupo ante Francia01netNetflix et vos jeux sur un écran de 147 pouces : ces lunettes XREAL passent à -52 %, c’est une dinguerie 🤯Business AMIndia importeert voor het eerst sinds Iran-conflict meer olie uit Golfstaten dan uit Rusland
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 12, 2026

The amazing disappearing exoplanet

Translate

The second oddity is that the transit duration grew progressively shorter in more recent observations. This suggests that, while early observations saw the planet transiting across the star’s equator, later ones involved transits near one of the poles, ensuring that the planet spent less time between the star and Earth. This trend eventually reached its logical end point: TOI-2535b simply stopped transiting in the most recent observations.

Obviously, gravitational interactions with a planet orbiting in a different plane could potentially alter TOI-2535b’s orbit so it no longer passes between TOI-2535 and Earth. There is also some precedent for the converse happening: a star around which no transits were originally detected but where transits began appearing in later observations. Still, as a Jupiter-sized planet, TOI-2535b should not be that easy to shift, and as the researchers note, “This is the fastest rate of inclination change observed for an exoplanet orbiting a single star.”

The second, unseen planet “would need to be either extremely massive or on a highly eccentric orbit,” the researchers noted. So they decided to figure out what sorts of configurations could lead to such rapid changes.

No clear answers

To do so, they modeled 300,000 different starting configurations and ran them forward in time. They found there wasn’t a single favored configuration; as long as the planets were in an orbital resonance, things were relatively stable, at least over relatively short periods. So they took the 100 best solutions and ran them forward for a million years.

About two-thirds became unstable during that period, which ruled out a couple of the potential resonances. The remaining third shared a couple of features. One is that the second, undetected planet has to be pretty massive—roughly Saturn-sized at a minimum. The second is that the angle between the orbits of the two planets can’t be that large. If it is, the difference would shrink over time, causing their orbits to become increasingly eccentric. Eventually, this results in a close approach between the two planets, followed by instability.

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.